To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: crap
 Results 601 – 620 of about 1500.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) post, (...) exactly. (...) claiming (...) find (...) I really don't think that LUGNET should have as low standards as TV does. but that's besides the point. I think if Suz asked it to be toned down, that's the end of the story - why argue with (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Why is it more absurd than a corporation's claim to a trademark? Note that the Treaty of Waitangi (1840) (URL) acknowledges Maori entitlement to cultural heritage, which includes their language. (URL) LEGO can acknowledge the importance of (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) heehee Right on, Tukawetse;-) -John (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Uh, troll, I don't think that the indians *owned* this country in the first place to have it "stolen". But this is .debate fodder for which I have not the time or inclination... , yet, when a company, like (...) As many are pointing out (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Most of the rest of this is pretty depressing PCness but I am totally behind this particular idea, where do I send my donations? :-) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) "Maori have stopped international toy maker Lego using Maori names without appropriate consultation. Instead Maori and the toy company are working together to develop a new range which respects Maori." The names are not exclusive. They are (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Somehow I think the kids will get over it -- BIONICLE is _so_ 2001.[1] In the meantime some of you might like to read the following, (URL) even do a google[2] search for the following: Mataatua Declaration Indigenous Cultural Property Treaty (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.year.2002)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
I do want to apologize for one thing. When I wrote that post with all the smileyes I was acting under the assumption that you would be comfortable with some friendly poking and jesting about the subject. Obviosly I was mistaken and you take this (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Uh... I am reeling. Surely there was a better solution somewhere in the middle. Is this why the video game was cancelled last week? Time to go into denial. Yes, serious denial, and I am not even a Bionicle collector! Of course, there are (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Maybe they are trying to avoid "hurting the feelings" of some tribe somewhere, but perhaps they should consider the hundreds of thousands of kids who will be disappointed that their favorate toy will be gone. (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) And rightly so. Shame on TLC for cowtowing to such complete and utter BS. God, how much longer will this total BS "PC" climate last????? *I* better end now before I say something I might regret:-/ -John (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
This is EXACTALLY what I said would happen! ((URL) only thing left open by the article is if LEGO will continue the line with new names, but that's not very likely seeing as names in contention are main characters and all. I am so ticked off about (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego) ! 
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
I decided no to read further than the first 2 lines. Respect is mutual. I offered a real friendly hand-shake, you answered back with god-talk, exactly what you know offends me. That's real nice of you. It just shows your level of respect for others' (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 

crap
(score: 0.271)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) You are entitle to your opinion, but it's not a load of carp. School community groups, social gatherings or extracuricular activities are necessary to the good devellopment of a child. Sports, Plaing games, having fun, learning Life's lessons, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) Wait a moment here...with the logic you're advocating you claim: Parents shouldn't drag their children into situations they may not be competent to decide for themselves. With such logic, you can also bring this argument to say that kids (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) The survival of the human race despite its own stupidity. (Okay, I guess that is kind of subjective) I have a better question for you. Why does lighting occur. Everyone I ask tells me the theory of how it occurs, but no one can tell be why it (...) (21 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
(...) I was, in fact asking this question because I don't approve of children being dragged to church by their parents. Religion (or absemce of) should be a decision that we make alone, without the parental influence. We all know that people believe (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

  For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
 
A better question would be, why do people come (...) got (...) Well, I discuss religion with respect to Legos because my spiritual relationship to Christ is the focus of my life and EVERYTHING else is secondary. If it were possible I wouldnt take a (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

  Is there any interest in a tiny scout-like brick?
 
I've been working on a tiny robot brick that I've nicknamed the "picoscout". The goal is to fit the key features of the Scout brick (the blue one) in a package the size of a light sensor. The plan is to have one pigtail for power, and 2 electrical (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

  Re: hizza my shizza, you dig? (translation: relatively new MOCs)
 
(...) well grizza ma felizza. always post your creations to lugnet. and i mean always. but more like ALWAYS POST YOUR CREATION ON LUGNET. if for no other reason than as a personal service to me. while i do check brickshelf, i hardly every flip more (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
 

crap
(score: 0.270)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR