To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: crap
 Results 481 – 500 of about 1500.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: WARNING, VERY DISTURBING IMAGES (was Re: Holy crap! )
 
(...) Wish I had the transcript of Tina's news report from SNL a few weeks back--A list of things Dubya hasn't been able to find. These days it's gone beyond agonizing frustration when I read about the deaths of soldiers. For what? Is there anymore (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.287)

  Re: Holy crap! And Hoppy thought he was the chief pagan :-)
 
(...) LOL Not I, McDuff... Maybe I'll try Taoism. 1. Unitarian Universalism (100%) 2. Secular Humanism (95%) 3. Liberal Quakers (92%) 4. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (86%) 5. Neo-Pagan (79%) 6. Theravada Buddhism (78%) 7. Nontheist (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.287)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) And on this we disagree. Up until now I've been on the side of angels--I mean Bruce and Hoppy. However, faith does not exclude questions. I question everything I am able, and have become quite disenfranchised with 'Religion'. This does not, in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) I think that any progression of society necessitates us being on, average, good, or there will be no healthy progression. I have to rely on my fellow person to do the work that I cannot do in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Waffling
 
(...) What kind of tulip madness was this? Are we talking "Samurai Bunny" comics? Where, when, and why? Do they maintain this absurd value? One of my better killings in comics -- of stuff with which I was actually willing to part -- was for the (...) (21 years ago, 27-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Honda Element Commercial Link
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Derek Raycraft wrote: <snip> (...) And you guys wonder why I don't visit your town more often... I find that the nicest drivers are ones that drive crappy pieces of crap like mine. SUV's, sports cars, all the new (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  My Control Lab Lives!
 
To all the CL owners out there... Yay! The latest version of Robolab provides full support for the CL. For those who may not know, Robolab is the educational version of Mindstorms, and offers a more powerful programming environment. You string (...) (21 years ago, 25-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Ecce Homo -- Mel Gibson's Passion (more fluff, sorta...)
 
(...) I say it's about time that filmmakers start taking chances and 'make art', instead of all this crass commercial crap. I mean, Matrix comes out and then a slew of copycats... and appealing to, well me, but that's a topic elsewhere--but bottom (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Not applicable, Mike. We are talking about civil unions here. (...) Really? How so? (...) But don't you see? This is what I am talking about! I am talking about social mores, culture, values. (...) I think you are confused in this assessment. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) No we are talking about legal marriages. That is very much the jurisdiction of the first amendment. (...) The silly notion that Christianity is somehow superior to our government and other religions. (...) Well you were talking about legal (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Have you EVER EVEN READ the HOLY BIBLE, John? I'm just going to cut and paste biblical cites from previous posts in this forum. I mean, why waste too much time on the usual John Neal foolishness? (URL) Sadly, many faiths do suborn the use of (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) The ACLU agrees ideologically with Oliver North? -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
Go Mike, go!!! A very reasonable and very american approach to the issues raised by John Neal. This is what it should all be about, all of us defending each other's right to liberty in the manner we choose to express it. I bow low to your greater (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
snip (...) The first phrase of the first amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,..." (...) I consider myself a Christian and I am sick of hearing this nonsense. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: final rules.
 
(...) bla bla... (...) ... (...) Has the rules page been updated to reflect these new diagrams and standards? There are those of us who live in another country, and can not attend the monthly dinners, so we don't really know what's going on with (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

crap
(score: 0.286)

  Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
 
(...) "Absolute unknown" can take on a lot of possibilities. If you mean unknown to the public in general then Arnold not an "absolute unknown". I have my sample ballot in front of me right now and am going down the list to see which names I (...) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

crap
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Transcription errors (was re: all because of me and my little LUG
 
(...) I always had an issue with Romper Room. (URL) always say some whitey names like Maryanne and Cory and crap like that. They never said hood-names like Calum or for that matter Mario, apparently. Calum (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

crap
(score: 0.285)

  Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
 
(...) I'll just take that as another sacarasm. (...) Again, I'm going to note Hardball on MSNBC. Arnorld has something no one else up there showed- charasima! If there is one thing I have seen all so often in this life (I was one of those teens who (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

crap
(score: 0.285)

  Re: This Californian Has Voted. Have You?
 
(...) Instinct. It's worked many times for me before. Ok, before you hit me with a "Get real!" remark I was just plain sick of the usual politicians. I just wanted to try someone else. (...) I was shown the blank side and so was the guy who asked me (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

crap
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Introducing JetRed
 
(...) I believe people have the right to say whatever the heck they want. Whether or not what they say is beneficial or not is a different story. Should people criticize and put down? I don't think its a good thing. Can you stop someone from (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.trains)
 

crap
(score: 0.285)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR