To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: brad justus <10>10
 Results 3821 – 3840 of 3926.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome
 
Dear Brad, Whether we like him or not, Larry is our Leader. I do not know Larry, but have been reading his posts for the past >year. Larry can come to the quick on most any topic quite lucidly. Listen to Larry, he is our man. Build On! John Matthews (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.182)

  Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome
 
John Matthews wrote in message ... (...) Bzz, sorry, thank you for playing. Larry does not speak for me, nor is he my leader. If anyone is in charge here on LUGNET it is Todd and Suzanne. No offense, Larry. I just don't want Brad and Lego to get the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.182)

  Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome
 
(...) He is? Don't get me wrong, I like Larry and all, but I didn't even know we HAD a leader. I assume you're just being silly, but let's not give Brad the wrong impression! (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome
 
All Hail Larry! At the risk of drifting off-topic allow me to digress a moment. John, are you a lurking Larritarian?! If so, rejoice! Send your 1 brick love offering to Larry in Ada and receive a bounty 100 fold!! Do not take this offer lightly... (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  What I'd like to see...please
 
Hi, Brad & co. I'd like to see a cd-Rom full of building instructions from older sets. I think this could be really great, if done properly. It should: Have teh sets available by set number and also by category ("Pirates," "Space," etc.) It should (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Brad, This brings up a very important point, is there a valid approved email address where we can report problems with the www.LEGO.com web site ? Many sites call this a feedback address. I'm thinking of a place where I could send a message (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Yeah, but it's all the same. :) When I feel the urge to call someone a jackass I don't normally disguise it in roundabout phrasing designed to keep him from wanting to punch me in the face. (...) And you would have won vocab bonus points for (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Well... uh, I don't think I am advocating that, nor have I really seen anyone else DO that. I'm sure Brad is an ok guy. I'd like to meet him some day. Anything I say, good, bad, or otherwise, about Lego the _company_ isn't meant to "shoot" (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
In lugnet.general, Brad Justus writes: [snip] (...) [snip] Brad I think you might need a MeatWorld analogy to help you here. Think of the Web as a giant printing press spewing out paper day and night... Yep thats the facts, If I *spider* your whole (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Anagrams. If his full name it "Bradley Justice" we get "rejects audibly" From plain old "Brad Justice" I get "arid subject" BTW : From "the lego group" I get "ghoul protege" Scott A Anagrams from: (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Hey Brad, I am another party guilty in TLCs eyes of posting a message to the effect that I would provide my own scans of 2000 products to any who asked. I decided to pursue this until an answer came from yourself or Todd, and now that it has I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.adventurers)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Fair Play (was Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs)
 
(...) Brad, Is the Fair Play document still available via normal navigational means? I hope so, as this sentence would lead me to believe we should no longer reference it if it is not. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
Brad Justus (legodirect@lego.com) wrote: : To LEGO enthusiasts everywhere: : We cannot tell you how excited we are to be working with you all. We hope you : are equally encouraged by the renewed commitment we are making to you. We look : forward to (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Maybe "Dear Lego" sub groups would help
 
Greetings and Happy Holidays to all! I have been watching the general chaos that has followed our Friend Brad's announcement. While I honor everyone's choice to express thier own ideas, be they ill informed emotional off balance Lego bashing, or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) I thought shipping was free on all items? Besides, you're only speaking to a clerk behind the phone who doesn't have the power to make a decision on how shipping will cost. By reading less than a half of this thread if I was Brad, I'd be (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Thank you, Brad. This is exactly what I wanted to hear. I will do so. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Maybe "Dear Lego" sub groups would help
 
(...) what (...) I like your ideas and agree that it has been hard to sift through the constructive conversation and the irrational rants lately. My feeling is that a lot of people came out of the wood work after Brad's initial post to vent their (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Well, nothing is "free". I prefer to think of the shipping as "built-in" which is what it is, really. I guarantee you it costs them FAR less to ship out 20 copies of a service pack in one box to one address than it costs them to ship 20 copies (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
Mike Stanley wrote: <snip> (...) Yeah, I think we got y'all's point. But I think the real point is: legalities aside, TLC didn't want that material distributed around. Just because one is *able* to get something on this side of a firewall doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) And then Lego, the company, starts talking illegal legalese right at the beginning. It sort of got to me, because, well, I'd hoped those sorts of things were over with. No go, apparently. Note that the posts madde bry Brad the person as (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR