|
 | | Re: Libertarian theory and altruism
|
| I agree, let's put a pin in it for now. Let's start a new thread for that one. Until Todd fixes cnews, if we post in the thread where you discussed my life affirming post and agreed that initiating force is unacceptable, but didn't see the link to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
rights, property
(score: 3.968)
|
|
| | LP POINT 2
|
| LP POINT 2 Larry If an individual were to find him/herself in your propertyist dreamland with no food, no water, no education, no money, no property and starving. What rights would he/she have? Which right would be strongest: 1. The right of the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) No addendum needed, and mostly the system is already there. Judges do have a lot of flexibility. Unfortunately, over the years they have been given less flexibility. Also, countersuits already handle some of the problems. Mostly what has to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Re: Scans Ready: Star Wars, Rock Raiders, and other 1999 sets.
|
| (...) And since this is .publish, I'd like to comment on the attitude taken by the AGONN site. Okay, I understand wanting everyone to know you're the one who got the scoop, etc., but it was tasteless to write that in big letters _over_ the actual (...) (26 years ago, 2-Nov-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Re: Fixing the world (was Re: Ldraw cannon
|
| <366C8C88.9640F50F@c...OSPAM.com> <slrn76qr20.1j0.cjc@...S.UTK.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Oh, but they are. There is a direct link between thinking that it's OK to ask/force someone else to (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.967)
|
|
| | Gun debate (was Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Demonstrate the need to own LEGO, then. What a silly question. No one should have to demonstrate needs here. We're talking about acquisition of property. If I have the resources, and the acquisition of property per se does not infringe the (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Update on Maori/Bionicle dispute
|
| (...) but this line of reasoning lies on specific terms, not broad cultural terminology. the maori seem to have a problem with the use of maori terminology, albeit some of them with religious connotation. i mean "pohatu" means "stone"; given your (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Republication is EXTREMELY different from posting links, and would indeed be illegal. Please see my post at <URL:(URL) (...) No one is saying anything about "overarching" or "fair game". There is no overarching connection between republishing (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) The box is already open. This proposed law is just reminding us that it is open. But we don't want to close it. Lawsuits are the civilized way of settling disputes. (...) But what basis do you use to hold the cat thrower responsible for his (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I think that's too simple a dismissal. See my previous post about isolated facts and how they can add up to Really Big Secrets. "this fact by itself doesn't tell you much" is not a valid defense in and of itself. Besides, unless we're in the (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: rights to SW pieces
|
| (...) I was always under the impression that 'Star Wars elements' would mean such things as the logo, names and possibly the clothing designs. An element is not neccasarily a physical object, merely an idea or design. If you look more carefully you (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jun-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
|
| (...) Hmm, if land is not a good, then what rules should govern trading it? If you always have a right to some land as part of your right to exist, then what stops you from "selling" your land, and then demanding a land grant because you're now (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
|
| | Re: Copyright/Fair use question
|
| (...) If he wouldn't have purchased it a million years, then why would he want you to give a copy to him? If you're giving a copy to him because he wants it but wouldn't in a million years deign to purchase it, then it's theft. Same with books and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.966)
|
