LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 521 – 540 of about 136000.

Search took 0.03 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Validity testing (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
(...) Disagree that this is an application of such. Let us postulate that I own clear title to a piece of real property for the sake of what follows, to avoid the (legitimate, in my view) questions of was might involved in acquiring title. These (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.974)

		Re: Vague abstract debate that puts people to sleep?
(...) The whole "everything can be called property rights" seems so leaden to me. I won't argue it either way - it just seems like a game of semantics to me. What I could add is pendantic: Chris is right from a the single sale point on value, but (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.974)

		Re: Brickshelf instruction scans
However this brings up an interesting dilemma....Brickshelf (now Brickshelf LLC) was founded to originally display the scans of instructions and catalogues....the hosting of MOC's and other stuff was secondary. The compilation of the scans was the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)

rights, property
(score: 3.973)

		Re: McDonald's Happy Meals Sets -- modified parts
(...) Not really. The LEGO logo doesn't imply intellectual property rights on the whole brick (which would include the likeness of the McCopyrighted character). It could just be an odd occurrence -- the copyright notice in the mold was damaged, so (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.promo)

rights, property
(score: 3.973)

		Re: Genocide and terrorism (Was: SW <-> Russia conspiracy)
(...) Right on. I have a brother in law who has exhibited enough cluelessness and consequence avoidance that he's on the verge of being written off. (...) Right on. Key difference here. If you don't get it, re-read. Rights are about behaviours. Even (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.972)

		Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
(...) Hmm, since we've been playing with taking interpretations to extremes to see how they work out, a technique which I wholeheartedly endorse... - Can you justify your ownership of anything metal? The metal was "found". - Can you justify your (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.972)

		Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)
Ok, I noticed something odd while mulling over the topic on my way home last night... While I admitted elsewhere that I agree to a certain degree of immorality for eating meat, but that it was negligible, I'm actually not sure that's the case-- at (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.972)

		Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
Darn, wish I'd seen this note before posting a second ago. (...) That's how I see it too. But that is wicked, not good and just. (...) Convince me. (...) I'm not yet convinced. I'm not ready to accept as fact that humans exist in the unalterable (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.972)

		Re: Rolling Blackouts
(...) This is one reason I really like the Nature Conservancy. The bulk of their effort goes to acquiring property, either through outright purchase, or by attaining conservation easements. Once they have acquired property rights by (mostly) free (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.972)

		Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
(...) Yes, how to construct a good society is an important issue. I think that the property rights discussion may eventually get there in a few months. grin You're welcome to join in or follow along. (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.972)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) Yes, me too. My hunch is we'll get into this in the property-rights discussion -- but not for a while yet. (...) (For the record, it actually turned out to be a terrible disaster.) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.971)

		Re: Microsoft spreads Linux FUD
(...) I think that the point that they are inarticulately trying to make is: "The system of proprietary intellectual property rights provides an incentive to put money into research. The principles of openness and sharing demonstrated in the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)

rights, property
(score: 3.971)

		Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
(...) Er, ah... I mean THIS QUESTION, which deals with Todd's property rights... NOT the ENTIRE FAQ, although that's the way it read to me when I re-read it... (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)

rights, property
(score: 3.971)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) OK, go ahead and invent away. I don't invent for free. (...) So let me see here, what you're proposing is that I go out and invent something, someone else steals my idea, gets it to market first, and makes a pile from the users, and I don't (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 3.971)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) See my reply to Weeks. (...) were (...) Again read my reply to Weeks. (...) Construction workers are employed by construction companies. Those companies have winter layoffs. Those employees, having worked 6 months or more, are entitled to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)