|
 | | Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
|
| (...) Enemy combatants are treated differently than US citizens. This has always been the case. (...) Well, if you had Christian leaders invecting from the pulpit to incarcerate Muslims, I might be inclined to agree (which is the analogy to Mullahs (...) (19 years ago, 2-Jan-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 1.091)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.090)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.090)
|
|
| | Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
|
| (...) I am from the United States of America, and I must admit that there are many things that fascinate me about the rise to power of Hitler and the Nazi party. The questions I hear most people say include, "How could a whole country allow such an (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.090)
|
|
| | Re: Separation of Church and State
|
| (...) Absolutely! And if someone tries to prevent those people from praying, I'll be first in line to defend their right to pray as they choose. The right to worship is Constitutionally protected, even on school property (provided that it's not done (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 1.090)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.090)
|
|
| | Re: Contest rules
|
| While I am not particularly impressed by the infighting - I love the idea of everybody having a go at building form a target mecha. How about we drop all the rivalry, and all have a go at building one. We could give people bragging rights on "the (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.build.contests)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.089)
|
|
| | Frozen Contest Winner!
|
| (...) OK, time to annouce a winner. Sorry for the delay in getting the annoucement out since the contest officially ended Sunday at midnight. There were a ton of fantastic entries, so it was very difficult choosing a winner. Several times as I (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-05, to lugnet.fun, FTX) !
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.089)
|
|
| | Re: Rückkehr der Raumnazin
|
| (...) It's not as clear-cut as that. I agree that humour can and should push the boundaries of taste and I'm deeply concerned when people imply that humour can be derived from certain subjects only by certain groups. We laugh often because we are (...) (19 years ago, 22-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.088)
|
|
| | Re: The Soren Building Challenge
|
| (...) Excellent - the more reference material, the better (...) And for those who do metric - like me - that (provided by a rough guage of old 12 Inch rulers) is about 30-35 Cm. (...) I have no built many mechs, but for anything I build, articulate (...) (19 years ago, 22-Dec-05, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.088)
|
|
| | IRON MECHA
|
| Ladies and Gents, Regarding recent events, and general interest abound, I am announcing a contest that shall begin Jan 1, 2006. IRON MECHA This is a contest of building talent and fun. I do not have all the details worked out yet, but it is my (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.announce, lugnet.build.contests, FTX) !!
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.087)
|
|
| | Emaar Properties and the LEGO® Group to launch Burj Khalifa Architecture Series model
|
| Emaar Properties and the LEGO® Group to launch Burj Khalifa Architecture Series model on May 25, 2011 Dubai, UAE; May 25, 2011: Emaar Properties has joined hands with the LEGO® Group to unveil the Architecture Series model of Burj Khalifa, the (...) (13 years ago, 26-May-11, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.people, FTX)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.085)
|
|
| | Re: Mega Bloks wins SCOC ruling on Lego trademark
|
| (...) Bryan Wong spotted this story earlier and posted about it (URL) here,> but thanks for the heads-up as well. This is good news on all counts, IMO. Since it amounts to an across-the-board dismissal of LEGO's "trademark" claim (in Canada, at (...) (19 years ago, 21-Nov-05, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 1.084)
|
|
| | GFLTC at the Scale Rail Train Show - Nov. 26-27, 2005
|
| For Immediate Release Contact: Robin Werner robinw A-T gfltc D-O-T org FORT MYERS, FLORIDA - The Greater Florida LEGO Train Club (GFLTC) is proud to announce its participation in the Scale Rails Holiday Train Show this November 26-27, 2005 at the (...) (19 years ago, 21-Nov-05, to lugnet.events, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.loc.us.fl, lugnet.org.us.gflug)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 1.084)
|
|
| | Property Rights are the foundation of freedom
|
| so opines Khaled Saffuri, saying "For Iraq to be free, property must belong to its people.", in a editorial column in today's USA Today. (URL) view is also held by Hernando de Soto, and by me... quoting: - start - Iraq is not the only country (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 1.083)
|
|
| | Re: Design
|
| (...) That's a very interesting point. Why won't it be popular? There's just been a long thread on Seattle Robots then another on PARTS about fine-tuning the rules for walking contests. There are similar threads here about "can I use non-lego (...) (19 years ago, 4-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.083)
|
|
| | New contest: Was Design
|
| Peter, Everyone interested. The thread (fractured as it was) was getting a bit long to quote everyone, so I thought I'd start this new one. Yes, Peter, I agree with 99% of all that you have stated. I think the 'boys' toy model works, even if only (...) (19 years ago, 4-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.083)
|
|
| | Re: Custom Sensor poll (Re: Mindstorms on Slashdot)
|
| Steve Hassenplug wrote: > >> The counter argument to all that, is those rare lego parts, or country >> specific ones that are not easily obtained. Hypothetically, what is the >> difference between me (being in Canada) getting cybermaster touch >> (...) (19 years ago, 2-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.083)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 1.082)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 1.082)
|
