|
|
| all, property (score: 1.211) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 1.210) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 1.210) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 1.210) |
|
| | Re: BrickWorld 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
| (...) I know I'm a little late to this discussion, but here I am. :) It's funny to be reading this discussion this week, as I was just discussing the same thread about a different subject last week. I've been doing quite a bit of conference speaking (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld, FTX) !
| |
| all, rights (score: 1.209) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 1.208) |
|
| | Re: BrickWorld 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
| (...) I don't think "bringing a MOC" is a valid argument for being a volunteer unless you have a following of people who and pay to get into events purely to see YOUR art. Which YOU probably do since you're famous. ;) I bring a MOC for display and (...) (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.events.brickworld)
| |
| all, rights (score: 1.208) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.204) |
|
| | Re: Fan Thank You Letter
|
| (...) Boy, I sure need a course in "how!" I am searching the literature on how LINUX hurts the trademark on Windows. Or more to the point, how Pocket Linux hurts the trademark on an HP Handheld or palm computer that originally held as its OS the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.204) |
|
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
| (...) snipped (...) Indeed! New Mexico has approved land for Virgin Galatic to build the first international spaceport. Virgin Galatic is even taking applications for employees. (URL) Commercial enterprise will drive down costs and increase (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |
| all, property (score: 1.203) |
|
| | Re: malicious behavior
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) I couldn't give a rats ass about DMCA, 'fair usage', 'freedom of speech' or '1st ammendment rights' or whatever people are going on about now--it's all obfuscating the actual issue. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights (score: 1.201) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.200) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.200) |
|
| | Re: Solid Aluminum 2x4 Bricks!
|
| Darrell, I offered my views on this issue, with references. [1] I did not specifically defend the practice and I don't have a final answer either. My conclusion is that Lego construe their proprietary rights to be much broader than patent law (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-02, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 1.200) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.198) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.197) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.197) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 1.197) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 1.197) |
|
|
| all, property (score: 1.196) |