To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 2101 – 2120 of about 136000.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) No we are talking about legal marriages. That is very much the jurisdiction of the first amendment. (...) The silly notion that Christianity is somehow superior to our government and other religions. (...) Well you were talking about legal (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.151)

  Re: Selling my MOC Gunstar (maybe)
 
(...) I don't think that somebody's level of "die-hardness" (?) has any bearing on this discussion. But the Bram Lambrecht incident certainly does. Grab yourself a cold beverage, get comfortable, and read this nice piece of armchair lawyering: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.market.theory)
 

all, property
(score: 2.151)

  Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
 
(...) No, as in meaning that your opinion that there is a problem that needs to be dealt with is not shared (currently) by the various managers involved. (...) Prosecute: no, I'm not conceding that, except as a consequence of the artist not bowing (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.150)

  Re: The 1st....
 
(...) Seems pretty cut and dried to me. What rights did the posters purchase from the owner of the publishing venue (the owner of the privately owned BB)? Assuming the owner is in the US that's all that matters, posters nationality is irrelevant. (...) (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.150)

  Re: And now for some fluff after all the heavy conversations...
 
(...) What?! Yeah thats not a violation of his constitutional rights or anything. (...) Agreed. (...) Ok that picture was just messed up. This calls for... -General Insanity (URL) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.150)

  Re: Bush AWOL
 
(...) When you combine this with (URL) you get part of MAD magazine's article: MAD's Deck of 52 least wanted Americans. One of which is the 2004 Democratic presidental nominee: Whether it be Al, Bob, Joe, or Rick, you want a loser take your pick. (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.149)

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) And we discussed this before--and you added addendums to the idea of "whole people" to not include those that are too young, old, infirm, or mentally unstable. Did you also stop to consider that, in context of the day and age, that "whole (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.149)

  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Perhaps I was too light in my characterization. While I think that brother/sister unions are deeply taboo, I also believe that they are pathological, and that their "wrongness" possibly stems from genetics. (...) I have to believe that God is (...) (21 years ago, 15-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.149)

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) I agree if there were laws or even constitutional rights that caused the deaths of innocent life I would be all for removing them too. Of course removing the right of law abiding citizens to have weapons does not reduce the crime rate, even (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.148)

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) Not at all. You would be 100% correct as to the meaning at the time of ratification. But collectively, the 13th and 14th Amendment gave freed slaves the status of Freemen. Knowing precisely what that meant, many freed slaves had to obtain guns (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.148)

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) You didn't say anything new in there at all, Mike. Lets have a looksee-- " Are you joking? “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.147)

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) Did you even read that cite again? Read the whole 3 message thread please: **From Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia: POSSE COMITATUS. These Latin words signify the power of the county. Or yet again in other words: the power of (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.147)

  Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
 
(...) It hasn't been amply settled. You are not a well regulated militia by any standard of those words. It's a point you consitently avoid--you and others cut right to the "the rights of the people to own guns shall not be infringed" Further, you (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.147)

  Misleader and the Gay Apocalypse
 
First just go and see it: (URL) A Band of Brothers: The Rebuilding of Iraq (URL) Recent estimates now put the final figure somewhere between $200 billion to as much as half a trillion dollars over the next ten years. America's Iraq-sticker-shock may (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.147)

  7470 Space Shuttle Discovery Review
 
7470 SYSTEM / Discovery / NASA Space Shuttle Discovery Ages 9+, 821 Pcs. (C)2003. 95 page manual: 1 models, 62+18 steps. Price Range: $50 USD MSRP, paid $55 CAD plus taxes RATINGS (Scale: Must-Have Excellent Very-Good Good Fair Poor) Set: Must-Have (...) (21 years ago, 26-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.reviews)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.146)

  Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
 
(...) Yes, of course they do. And that's not always a bad thing except when it gets kinda rabidly slanted a particular way. I try to post stuff that is at least semi-objective from a huge variety of sources. Sure, some of it is just (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.146)

  Re: Information War (actually re: seriously)
 
(...) I would vigorously dispute that. In fact I already have, and the person I disputed them with was satisfied that what I was getting at was that Richard acknowledge that he erred, acknowledge that he doesn't get a pass because he's an Angry (...) (21 years ago, 4-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 

all, property
(score: 2.145)

  Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
 
(...) I still would like to respect the author's choice not to have the raw DAT code posted, it is after all his/her property. -Orion (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, property
(score: 2.143)

  Re: banner year for castle
 
In lugnet.castle, Tanvir Mahtab wrote: SNIP (...) I'm not a castle-head so I have little personal attachments or expectations for these castle sets. That said, I agree that the models in and of themselves are not very attractive, especially when (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
 

all, property
(score: 2.140)

  Re: Disclaimer
 
(...) Here is a "can disclaimer" that I use on all of my BIs. Note that I DO NOT SELL my BIs DISCLAIMER All content is provided as is, with no warranty stated or implied regarding the quality or accuracy of any content.  All trademarks, service (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.inst, FTX)
 

all, property
(score: 2.139)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR