To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 1381 – 1400 of about 136000.
Search took 0.03 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  TRU, tax free at Superstore (oct 27-)
 
No LEGO in the Wal-mart flyer this week. ----- Superstore is having a tax free day on Saturday October 29th. LEGO at some stores. ----- TRU flyer good Friday Oct 28 through Thursday Nov 3. 20% off all LEGO Angry Birds and Scooby-doo building sets. (...) (8 years ago, 27-Oct-16, to lugnet.loc.ca)
 

all
(score: 0.758)

  Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
 
(...) Well, it was a minor but--semantics--irrelevant to the discussion at hand. An *opinion*, a voice, a discourse is *protected* by the 1st. If I don't like your opinion--my tough cookies, just as if you don't like mine--your tough cookies. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, property
(score: 0.757)

  Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
 
(...) The United States is a democratic republic. Fine, no problem--never said it wasn't--I said the way to get things changed is thru democracy, the process in which the people *vote*. (...) "Government is not reason and it is not eloquence. It is (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, property
(score: 0.757)

  Re: Idealism vs Realism?
 
(...) I don't think this is an accurate description at all. Americans do ACT and they often pay a much higher price than you might imagine. (...) Hmmm, I don't know this one. But if the equations are: privileges = rights (as is done in a lot of case (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.757)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: <snip> (...) Your Type is INFP Introverted Intuitive Feeling Perceiving Strength of the preferences % 44 33 22 56 Dave K. If I were to guess, I would say that Dave! is ESTP, Chris is ISTJ and Larry is (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
 
(...) Sorry, if 99 people out of 100 vote that the sun rises in the west, does that mean it does? No. If 99 people out of 100 vote to expropriate the property of all Tshirt manufacturers does that mean it is morally correct to do so? No. If this (...) (22 years ago, 13-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, property
(score: 0.756)

  week 3 bricktober
 
Sorry I missed posting about Bricktober week 2. Neighbours painting had me really ill. No LEGO in the Walmart or Superstore flyers. ----- Sears online at least has the LEGO minifig lights 25% off. ----- Bricktober week 2: Friday October 14 - (...) (8 years ago, 14-Oct-16, to lugnet.loc.ca)
 

all
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) A fine question! Off the top of my head I'd say that too general a framework (as I perceive Myers-Briggs to be) isn't much more useful than no framework at all. As you've correctly stated, the user needs to be aware of the limitations of the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
I'm not sure why I continue debating here. It's hard to see all the sides of a person when the debate draws out like this. My initial reaction to this incident was based on a number of incidents in a very short time. In all likelihood I am (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) It is silliness. But it's like The Simpsons silliness--is fun! And if you're not careful about it, you may learn something about yourself :) I'm not all that introverted--I like going to parties and such, but by the end of an evening, I'm (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) OK, so did you just use those two as examples of the hundreds, or is that all you've got? I'm not trying to be trite about this, but I think you could find more than two civil rights abuses in a year on any given year since you've been alive. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: 2nd Amendment -- Bare Bones
 
(...) Well, perhaps there is no resolution -- we certainly have more than one instance of bad law, bad stare decisis, coming down from the high court...and it does annoy. The court has, in particular, been guilty of making bad law that is in the way (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) I think we have to understand when subjective measurements are being used, but I don't think we need to reject them. Food preferences are totally subjective, but should someone ignore them because they don't have the objective data on why they (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) Deeper and deeper... In an English course a few years ago we discussed that bane of rational thought: Postmodernism. In a clever ploy to make PM seem like the thing to be, the author of one of our texts assembled list that I will paraphrase: (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) Thank you for the link; I'd never even heard of "ENFP" before, so it was all news to me. But at a quick run-through, the test seems problematic. Consider these questions: Q: You want a job or a career that offers you the chance to travel and (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) Ah, but then you've fallen into the trap already! The whole point of these Myers-Briggs (or Voigt-Kampf, if you prefer) tests is that they're designed to yield apparently "correct" personality assessments, no matter how the answers come out. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) <snip> (...) Now here's a debate I'm so moveable on is not really funny--my girlfriend, taking the courses at the Institute of Christian Studies, expounds the ideals that come with PM--that there is literally no one "right way" of doing (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
(...) Done and done! I remember a time in my youth when my mom was so into 'dream interpretation'. She and a few of her close friends would get together and discuss their dreams, look up symbols in books about that stuff that were available at the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.756)

  2nd Amendment -- Bare Bones
 
Here is the quote part: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This could just as easily read: Because a free state must protect itself (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.755)

  Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
 
I have collected a largish sample (two batches of 30) of these tests before. After a few I noticed there are two types of test-takers: those who are all-or-nothing to whichever side of each scale (almost half the sample), and the rest. I said this (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.755)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR