 | | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) how about gravity??? see, you cant just say your bot ~NEEDS~ something just to make it a bot. you need to add a challenge that will make it easier to USE the RCX then not. For the BoP game, if you didnt want to see the tower robots, make a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) At one time we did have an unofficial rule were you DID have to use an RCX. that has pretty much changed with Rob's "monkey bot" we have seen that cool solutions can be had without using the rcx. the best way to "force" an RCX event is to have (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized microscale train
|
|
(...) Cool! That should sort the problem of how to propel 2-wide trains (for those who don't have N-gauge track)! Mark (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) the jokes are HALF the fun of this game. Chris (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) ineresting.... but i had a closed design in mind. as steve has said, this open top hopper makes it too easy to plant a box and walk away. so your standard repitcle. should be a X by X hole in a wall, vs an open top box. i think a hole in the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) I'm with you Derek - the object of the contests is to come up with the best and most creative solution. And the ring "bots" were definitely creative. My take on this is that the ring bots were a little too close to Jeff E's fish sticker sumo (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: The Better Tosser
|
|
(...) Between burning out two motors on a prototype and having the tire in my pirate ship become bald by the end of BrickFest, I think I'm done building GBC shooting mechanisms. But they're so much fun . . . I wonder if my prototype (which is still (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 1955 'idea book' Byggebog, translation help needed
|
|
(...) Dave, Thanks for the great scans. This book is really interesting! Eric (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Well that’s true, like I said I don't mind creations like that, just heard a few people make comments such as "is that a robot?" and such at rtl 19, so thought I might suggest it. Myself I have a few ideas that don't include an RCX either, and (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: What mailing list for Peeroml ?
|
|
Hi Tim, Thanks for your comments. (...) I don't expect OCaml to spread like a virus, or being a popular scripting language. All that i have asked is a single homepage where people (eventually nobody) could have downloaded the whole thing. I didn't (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Fire Fighter's Dalmatian
|
|
Here is a studs up mosaic of a Dalmatian Puppy wearing a Fire fighters, Captains Helemt. The mosaic was built without a CAD program. When hanging on the wall, it is as if the picture is looking at you where ever you are in the room. It is 56 studs (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.mosaic)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Unfortunately I couldn't make to 19, but I didn't see any designs that I thought should be rejected. The ring bots were an excellent concept, but I expect they're the ones people most complained about. I don't see anything wrong with a bot (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: UDITE ! UDITE !! oops .. LEGGETE! LEGGETE !!!
|
|
(...) ...anche se alla fine avevamo concordato che era DAS Lego ;-P sebbene a casa mia si dica LA Lego ;-) Ciao! Luca (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug, FTX)
|
| |
| | 1955 'idea book' Byggebog, translation help needed
|
|
I recently received a 28 page 'idea book' with the word Byggebog on the cover. I am told 'Byggebog' means "building book" or "manual for constructions" The book doesn't have any date on it, but, according to Gary Istok, it dates from 1955 when the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) Well I am not really against that, its just more interesting that way. Vitali (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) So, you'll disqualify an entry because it's too simple? Like Rob's monkey-bar "robot"? Steve (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Mating Game - moc up
|
|
(...) With the turn out of rtl 19's entries, I think that there sould be some sort of rule this time, that says that your entry much be a robot. Meaning that it should have an RCX that it uses, and some motor/sensors that it uses. As this is a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Stargate
|
|
(...) So If I wanted to put together a SG1 team in minifig scale, I took a look through the Bricklink Minifig Head category and came up with: Jack O'Neil: (URL) or (URL) with (URL) in light grey or a backwards cap (URL) Samantha Carter: (URL) with (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: My Latest Creation
|
|
(...) Sounds nice. So, it has a motor to steer in addition to the drive motors? Is there a reason for not using the build-in steering? Oh, I guess for future development. (RCX Controlled) Would it be possible to have the polarity switch so it will (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | Re: Major update to my vehicle folder.
|
|
(...) (snip) (...) Thank you Steve! :-) With the price of gas these days, I'm not sure I'll attend each and every ParLUGment meeting. But I'll try to go to Railfair, and if I do I'll bring some MOCs for sure. Pierre (21 years ago, 19-Sep-05, to lugnet.town, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
|
