Subject:
|
Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 May 2005 15:24:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1465 times
|
| |
|
|
Bryan Kinkel wrote:
> I understand your frustration with the state of trains. I for one want to
> see automated points, lights, etc in the style of the 80s 12V system.
Those were deemed too complicated and that's why they're not in the 9V
system anymore.
--
Jan-Albert van Ree | http://www.vanree.net/brickpiles/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
| Too complicated for adults? Or too complicated for children? Did LEGO determine that the automated parts were too complex for their target audience (children?) Assuming it is *financially viable*, why can't LEGO have introductory train sets for (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
| (...) Complicated --- hrm. I was a child in the 80's and absolutely loved those. They certainly weren't too complicated - and remember that they were provided with the same kind of instructions (excellent, that is) as other Lego sets. If (...) (19 years ago, 20-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
| Gary, Don't get all disappointed. It was me who originally made the post about the subject of the message. I was catching up on emails, LUGNET posts, etc and saw the "New Lego Track!" subject. Of course it was not what I expected it to be. If my (...) (19 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
