Subject:
|
Re: PROPOSAL for new track (was Re: New Lego Track!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 May 2005 15:45:47 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2280 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
<snip>
| |
That’s not to say it couldn’t be profitable if we
were willing to pay higher prices, or if LEGO could figure out how to sell
more successfully.
|
That’s my huge hang-up. Why is it so impossible and dangerous to make an
investment into the Trains line, yet at the same time some completely clueless
individual or group convinced the right people in TLG that a huge investment
into Galidor would some how, some way make $$$ for TLG. It just doesn’t make
sense to me.
Both situations seem like no-brainers, although exactly opposite of the
decisions TLG has made (Go with Galidor, sit on Trains).
At the very least, a trains-line bomb is better than a Galidor-line bomb.
Interest in trains will go away. Galidor was gone virtually before it arrived
(although the embarrassment of Galidor may never go away;-)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
