Subject:
|
Re: Surprise, new train set
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:45:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
900 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Josh Baakko writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > The warbonnet scheme has been applied to a LOT of different locos over the
> > years, including some in service today that havent yet gotten repainted in
> > BNSF colors. I think there was even a dark blue/yellow variant for ATSF
> > freight service at one point, and you can argue that one of the current
> > multicolor BNSF schemes is derived from the warbonnet scheme.
>
> The Blue/yellow isn't considered a warbonnet though ;-) Only the
> red/yellow/silver... There was also a red/yellow design for the failed
> SP-SF merger...
Yes there was a red/yellow. Those are both warbonnets. The distinguishing
characteristic of the warbonnet scheme is (according to ATSF historians,
writing before you were born) the shape of the demarcation between the front
color and the rest of unit color, not the colors used, nor whether the
colors are separated with stripes.
So you're certainly entitled to the opinion that those schemes aren't
warbonnets, but it's not an opinion that's generally held.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Surprise, new train set
|
| (...) The Blue/yellow isn't considered a warbonnet though ;-) Only the red/yellow/silver... There was also a red/yellow design for the failed SP-SF merger... Josh (...) (22 years ago, 9-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
