Subject:
|
Re: String is not against the 100% LEGO pureness.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:20:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
881 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.modelteam, Tobbe Arnesson writes:
> > Oh, wait ... I already ruined that with the string 8?(
> >
> > Well, I don't want to go into *that* argument, but I feel string is one of
> > those few items that's perfectly acceptable to substitute with non-LEGO
> > materials :-)
>
> Agreed!
Me too!
I think rubberbands are other of those few items that can be substituted
with non-Lego materials... anyway, the only difference (I think) is where
the rubberband (or string in this case) was manufactured.
And Ross, about the steel rod that you thought to put in the crane, unless
you plan to show it in a contest or exhibition that only accepts official
Lego parts (no modified pieces, no non-Lego pieces), I wouldn't mind about
adding the steel rod to the crane.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
