| |
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Thomas Avery wrote:
> Thanks TJ!
> > Any chance for a Ldraw file of the beast? ;-)
>
> Now that you've asked there is a much higher probability of an MPD for this
> beast! ;^)
>
> Needless to say, phase two of this beast will be able to walk backwards, turn
> and *much* more. There is a very important reason why the body is hexagonal,
> not rectangular..... besides the fact that it looks more ogranic this way.
Cool. Looking forward to that!
Any plans for the Octa484? :-)
-TJ
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hex363
|
| (...) The fixed shape parts are easy. It is all the pneumatic tubes that are a pain to route. (...) You *know* the answer to this one! (...) Kevin (20 years ago, 24-Mar-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hex363
|
| (...) Thanks TJ! (...) Now that you've asked there is a much higher probability of an MPD for this beast! ;^) Needless to say, phase two of this beast will be able to walk backwards, turn and *much* more. There is a very important reason why the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Mar-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
