Subject:
|
Re: The barque Dodelijke Klompschoen
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:14:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5274 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.pirates, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
I used an online translator. The idea was ‘Deadly Clog’ (which is quite
silly). I did mean to include a note/apology to dutch speakers in my post,
but forgot to add it in all the excitement of the moment.
|
Ok, Well that’s cleared up then (BUT WE HAD OUR FUN AND IT DOES LOOK LIKE A
CLOG!!) and for the sake of completeness: the name should be: Dodelijke Klomp
(What’s with the captain’s name: ‘Puntblazer’ HaHaHa I don’t even dare to try to
translate that......)
And my apologies for misunderstanding the Centre-pieces thingie, I completely
agree with you on the lack of deck space with only 16 studs.
There is still a question I want to ask you: Why do you mainly build early 19th
century ships while the ‘Pirate Golden Age’ was around 1690-1730? (I also think
that ships from that period looked a bit better with those high sterncastles)
Robin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The barque Dodelijke Klompschoen
|
| (...) ;-) (...) The deck of the Dodelijke Klomp is certainly an improvement in width over the other Port Brique ships. I'm looking forward to being able to include a lot more deck detailing on the new Misérable. (...) Take your pick: Port Brique is (...) (19 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.pirates, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The barque Dodelijke Klompschoen
|
| (...) I used an online translator. The idea was 'Deadly Clog' (which is quite silly). I did mean to include a note/apology to dutch speakers in my post, but forgot to add it in all the excitement of the moment. (...) No I did not!!! What I said was (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.pirates, FTX)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
