Subject:
|
Re: I love LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:09:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
939 times
|
| |
|
|
Jason Whittenburg wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Terry Prosper wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote:
>
> > But I should stop right here before this blows up in my face.
>
> Then why didn't you? Would have been a good idea...
>
> > Still, my point about Chris is still standing. No one should be treated
> > as "inferior" because they use the "f" word in a sentence. It's uncalled for.
>
> The "f" word is uncalled for, it is last resort of a man without ideas,
> foundations, positions, or principals. It is the tool of an uneducation man.
Oh, puhleez. It's a WORD, not a lifestyle/defining principle.
And that's "uneducated".
> > To what point is this community about respect of the others and their right
> > to express themselves?
>
> I don't remember any such rights, the only right I know of here is the right to
> post until such time it is deemed by the owners and administrators of this sight
...and that's "site".
Oh, the irony.
>
> the one should not have the right to post anymore... In fact I find, along with
> George Carlin, that people who are desperate for repect and to be heard, seldom
> resect others nor listen to their points of view...
The irony is even thicker...
--
Tom Stangl
*http://www.vfaq.com/
*DSM Visual FAQ home
*http://www.vfaq.net/
*Prius Visual FAQ Home
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | I love LUGNET
|
| (...) Then why didn't you? Would have been a good idea... (...) The "f" word is uncalled for, it is last resort of a man without ideas, foundations, positions, or principals. It is the tool of an uneducation man. I know Chris personally and he is a (...) (19 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
