Subject:
|
Re: LDconfig.ldr - missing colors
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:44:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8146 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
> I don't know about the whole color thing but your post makes me think of an
> interesting point. Just how exactly is LDRAW supposed to handle displaying
> the Glitter Trans Clear color, and similar ones like it? I believe even
> handling the Pearl color variations would be difficult, requiring a rewrite
> of how LDRAW itself handles these colors, especially since it was never
> intended to display complex color variations in the first place.
Take a look at the !COLOUR spec here:
http://www.ldraw.org/Article299.html
Pearlescent is covered, along with rubber, chrome, matte metallic, and metal.
Glitter transparency isn't, and probably should be. Of course, just because
official LDraw colors can be defined with these attributes doesn't mean that any
programs actually display them. LDView pays attention to rubber and maybe
chrome and metal. It ignores the other material definitions. (With chrome and
metal, I know that when I'm not parsing ldconfig.ldr, I have special behavior
for chrome silver, chrome gold, and metallic silver; I can't remember if I have
special behavior when I see those tags, though.)
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDconfig.ldr - missing colors
|
| "Willy Tschager" <willy.tschager@tin.it> wrote in message news:K6D96D.Ews@lugnet.com... (...) I don't know about the whole color thing but your post makes me think of an interesting point. Just how exactly is LDRAW supposed to handle displaying the (...) (16 years ago, 30-Aug-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
