| |
In lugnet.admin.terms, Jeff Stembel wrote:
| |
Which secion of the TOS do those images specifically violate? Perhaps I’m
missing it, but I didn’t see any that those were *clearly* in violation of.
|
From the TOS:
“You agree to not use the Service to:
(a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful,
threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene,
libelous, invasive of another’s privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or
otherwise objectionable;
(b) harm minors in any way;”
I think 4 letter expletives can reasonabley considered “vulgar”,
“objectionable”, and harmful to minors.
I realize that some people use expletives simply as punctuation when they speak,
but that doesn’t make their common utilization any less civil; it merely
reflects the growing incivility of our culture.
JOHN
I’ll set the follow-up to .debate.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf find: Hello Vifam
|
| Moving back to admin.terms since this is not an off topic debate. The images do not *clearly* violate TOS if they have been moderated. Considering the size and obviousness of the lettering, it can't be argued that the admins didn't see it, and as (...) (18 years ago, 19-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
92 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
