Subject:
|
Profanity again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:55:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7244 times
|
| |
|
|
Looks like the problem has returned:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=25585
Dave! could have made this comment in a more appropriate manner.
Besides, John could have meant “frick’n” instead of the other f-word.
Adr.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Profanity again
|
| (...) And whereas I'd agree on a moral ground, having been a person who doesn't like to use profanity in everyday discourse, I do think that things said in o.t-d can get a little passionate. I'm not advocating usage of profanity in every post, but, (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | Re: Profanity again
|
| (...) Perhaps we could have implictly undestord code word substitutes for certain rude words. For example blasphous exclaimations could be replaced by "MegaBlok" and of couese, the word in question by "bley" (also a four letters) or the alternative (...) (20 years ago, 13-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
