To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: Moulton
 Results 56 – 75 of 100.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
 
(...) If I didn't mean what I said I wouldn't even BE here. I know I screwed up, even more so than you can realize. If my apology wasn't heart felt then why am I here? You seem to think I'm some sort of evil person, that I have some alterior motive (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  Re: My Stance
 
(...) If I believed that, I wouldn't be here. However I don't, and that's why I'm here, and that's why I want to try and fix whatever dammage I did. If you were a "bunch of...blah...blah...community" then my attacks would not have affected anyone, (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  What's going to happen.
 
I know I'm going to get banned again. Why do I know this? I don't know, it's just a feeling, I can't really explain it. It doesn't upset me too much though, because I was able to publicly apologize, and I was there to help some people relieve some (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
 
(...) I hope that's not how I'm being viewed. I made a stupid mistake, one that I'm not very proud of, I apologized for it, and more than that I hope to try and be a better person. There are some people who still genuinely hate me, that is their (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  No tolerance proposal.
 
I know that some people do not think I am sincere in my apologies and they want to see me banned. I would however like to make a no tolerance proposal. Basically I think that I should be on a sort of probation period for say the next three months. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  A reixamination of what happened.
 
I got to thinking today about what I REALLY did wrong here. What did I do wrong? I attacked Jude's site in a somewhat mean way and didn't give any reasons as to why I thought so. And that's it. That's all I did wrong. Well I did also get caught up (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  Re: A reixamination of what happened.
 
(...) Yes, but so far I haven't seen anyone show any evidence which points to the contrary. I mean let's see some evidence that I did something else wrong. And I don't mean weird conspiracies based on things I did over a year ago. And I also don't (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  Re: My Stance
 
(...) So the ENTIRE flame war was all me, huh? No one else participated at all? No one else helped add fuel to the fodder? That's kinda funny cause that's not exactly how I remember it. (...) Hey look, a conspiracy theory. Oh hey, here's a thought, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.857)

  Re: My NEW Lego site!
 
in article FsyDo7.BtL@lugnet.com, Matthew M at moulton@innw.net wrote on 4/13/00 4:38 AM: (...) some of your photographs. That is an excellent way of getting pictures of predominantly black constructions without having them look like a big muddy out (...) (24 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
 

moulton
(score: 0.831)

  Re: My NEW Lego site!
 
Matt, This is going to sound strange, but when I hold my cursor over the icon next to "Data Files - under construction", I see it should bring me to (URL) but when I click on it, it brings me to a link called Http://www.classicdate.com I can't (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
 

moulton
(score: 0.830)

  Re: Let’s be inclusive, and not exclusive. (was Re: My point.)
 
(...) Below is a copy of a message I have just written to Matthew via e-mail. If Matthew does show up here today, please try to keep things as civil as possible. --Todd ___...___ Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 11:24:33 -0400 From: Todd Lehman (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.815)

  LUGNET and Matthew Moulton
 
G'day folks, Yesterday, I think it was, I posted a message about how happy I was that I managed to stay out of the flame war. Now that discussions are a lot less heated, I think I'll add some thoughts. I've been thinking in point-form lately, so (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.814)

  Re: blowharding (was: Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...)
 
(...) into (...) <insert voice of moderation> Well, Matthew Moulton has been, IMO and in the apparant majority of opinions, a jerk today. *BUT* If you search back, you'll notice that he's been an infrequent, generally reasonable poster for upwards (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
 

moulton
(score: 0.813)

  Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
 
(...) I happen to agree. Since this thread started, I've exchanged a few emails with the lovely Mr. Moulton, and I have to say, I think he may have actually crossed the line-- just not in the way that anyone has before, I think. His admitted intent (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

moulton
(score: 0.813)

  Re: A little self examination?
 
(...) Ok...I occasionally babble, I'm long winded (and unrepentently so...), and I am a fanataical advocate of commonly disparaged themes. That's my contribution to the wackiness of this community... (hey, every village needs an idiot or madman) (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

moulton
(score: 0.812)

  Re: In conclusion... (my stance hasn't changed)
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Moulton writes: By acting as a virtual punching (...) Matthew: Please give up the martyr routine. We are here because you have said some nasty things and violated the TOS. I feel just fine about myself today, thanks. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.812)

  Re: Are we all too nice?
 
Ok, I've thought about it for a couple of days. (...) I don't know about that. Here's why: If something on Usenet truly offends me, I tend not to complain about it. Why not? Because there is no Usenet admin who can be expected to be looking out for (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

moulton
(score: 0.811)

  Re: Are we all too nice?
 
(...) Yes. (...) IMHO, it is right to expect polite behaviour in certain settings. Should a child tell off their parents? Should you tell off the judge sentencing you? Should you tell off your friend saving you a seat on the bus? Should you tell off (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 

moulton
(score: 0.811)

  Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
 
(...) Hmm, I don't think it ranked how often people posted (e.g., frequency) but listed the total numbers of articles posted by each person for a few groups. Anyway, here's an up-to-date list across all LUGNET newsgroups (I'll post something another (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)  
 

moulton
(score: 0.805)

  Re: Robert: Just another Troll
 
(...) Immense powers of destruction! I sleep better at night knowing that. (...) And you're actively defending us from external onslaught! I sleep better at night knowing that too. (...) OK, clue us in. (...) When we said *who* was the Mad Hatter? I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.797)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR