To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: Moulton
 Results 76 – 95 of 100.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Robert: Just another Troll
 
(...) .... (...) Hmmm, we may not be hearing from Robert much longer, though I guess he may have a few extra days depending on how much Todd wants to deal with this kind of crud right now. The way I read the above is that Robert just earned himself (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

moulton
(score: 0.796)

  Re: Robert: Just another Troll
 
(...) So does my cat...although she sleeps pretty much all the time. (...) Well no, but I would, should that ever arise, hopefully it won't. (...) If I had seemed to get along with you all more the chances that many of my pathetic obsessives would (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.796)

  Re: I'm back...
 
(...) Hence the futility of banning/repeat-cancelling Mr Moulton. I would never defend his past actions, but I see no point in continually bringing them up. Especially when he actually has some good stuff to show off, despite the rat-baggage. Who (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.793)

  Re: No promises when I'll be done, but...
 
(...) The Moulton flame war is on again, and when I investigated the original incident, I came to this post. The fighters look really cool, I like Mr. Wiskers and Roller, and the boxy ships look like a bunch could land on a planet and start a (...) (23 years ago, 29-May-01, to lugnet.space)
 

moulton
(score: 0.793)

  Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
 
Firstly, I'd like to thank Mr. Moulton for replying so candidly to my posts. -I'm obligated to make this my last conversation with you… for Lugnets sake and so that I don’t further exacerbate the situation. The reason why? Because to some degree I (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.793)

  Re: I'm back... (Clarified! )
 
Thank you so much for providing such a thorough background. I had no idea that this thread had so much depth. Now I kinda feel sorry for this Mr. Moulton. The only reason why he insulted Judes web-page was because he was harboring feelings of (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
 

moulton
(score: 0.793)

  Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
 
(...) ... (...) Well, to the best that I could follow, it goes roughly: Matthew Moulton made disparaging remarks about someone's teaser (URL) got offended, points were made, things were said, basically a flame war erupted. What the arguments (that (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
 

moulton
(score: 0.793)

  Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!
 
moulton (verb trans.): To assume another's id on LUGNET, without the permission of the user identified in the "From:" field. Neologism, just coined. (URL) (already canceled) (URL) anytime you get a chance to implement a web-based cancel facility (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.792)

  Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?)
 
Man this thread is hard to follow!!! (And I tried to go through all the 76+ stuff.) With all the canceled posts and the alleged ‘double-speak.’ I believe I've got all the players involved… but could someone please summaries what’s going on. I think (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
 

moulton
(score: 0.792)

  Re: Nothing personal, but...
 
(...) Moulton (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

moulton
(score: 0.792)

  Re: New LEGO Outlet Store
 
(...) ```No, not a Freudian slip!``` I know my psychodynamic theories, and the id of my unconscious did not reveal any hidden subtext. Simply put, I just didn’t know who to properly spell the word! :P Sooo...ooo, what he difference between the two? (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
 

moulton
(score: 0.790)

  Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
 
(...) While I'm not "glad" that because of Mr Moulton it isn't quite as simple to post on Lugnet as it used to be I am glad that this security measure will in all likelihood significantly dampen (and hopefully eliminate altogether) Mr Moulton's (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.790)

  The Problem (was Re: Eeek! I've been multiply moultoned!)
 
(...) Todd, (et al) I'm worried about a technical solution to authentication problem. In fact, I'm a bit worried about whether we're solving the right problem at all. To me it seems the problem is not enforcing a ban on individuals, it's more a case (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.790)

  Re: Are that many people really glad about the security stuff?
 
There are some problems I have with your arguments: 1. The person who caused all of this, I believe his name was Matthew Moulton, would still be joyfully spoofing everyone the moment he found someone with this feature turned off. 2. Todd would be (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.790)

  Re: Building big
 
I'm probably gonna get flamed a little for this but here I go. (...) computer? His ship is oviously not a render. If Kyle had created this ship in LDraw he would be God. (...) apologize (...) Ok this is a really weird comment. Others have adressed (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 

moulton
(score: 0.790)

  Re: Should resist (Was: Couldn't resist)
 
(...) That's neither here nor there. Simply build them. Some people will like them, some will dislike them. But that's not what I'm annoyed by... (...) Uh, yeah. Against my better judgement, which I'm having to temporarily shut down because it's (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
 

moulton
(score: 0.789)

  Todd, can you please deal with this
 
To all who read this, The post I am refering to has foul language and the link should not be followed without you being warned. Todd, Can you please address the situation of the following post: (URL) I feel extremly excessive language has been used (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.terms)  
 

moulton
(score: 0.785)

  Re: It is time to ban JAL.
 
(...) hi, To be honest, if there is anyone else who used this language, I would be all for banning them. Especially if when they were approached on the issue they tried to dodge responsibility for it and then blamed someone else, and then stated (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

moulton
(score: 0.785)

  I think we stepped in something.
 
G'day folks, Note 1: I decided to compose this post because of the events of late concerning Jesse Alan Long. If you don't want to read something that will make your head hurt, skip this ;] Note 2: I am not arguing with any actions that have been or (...) (23 years ago, 7-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

moulton
(score: 0.785)

  Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
 
(...) Tim certainly can determine what he thinks is a quality MOC. He could have dropped the word "quality" and it would have been valid. (...) You're right, Tim doesn't have the right to determine what is allowed on Brickshelf. He DOES, however, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

moulton
(score: 0.771)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR