Subject:
|
Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.year.2002
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:36:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
730 times
|
| |
|
|
just as Space cannot be released as
> long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or
> Legends).
So this is officially confirmed? How and why could LTG release LOM then? Is
inn't that considered Space legally?
Eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) Again, for those who have just joined us...: LoM is *not* considered Space any more than Aquazone (or Spaceport, which LoM replaces) was. If anything (shudder, shake, sputter) it's considered part of Town--phylogenically, but definitely NOT in (...) (23 years ago, 13-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) FTR, Brad mentioned (at Brickfest) that Castle sets could not be released as long as Lego has the Harry Potter License, just as Space cannot be released as long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or Legends). (...) (23 years ago, 4-Aug-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
