Subject:
|
Re: GMLTC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains.org
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:40:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
823 times
|
| |
|
|
Please take any further followup to email, Kai
In lugnet.trains.org, Kai Brodersen writes:
> And i guess with the ending of this post comes the fact that we are enemies,
> Larry
No, we're not. I bear you no animosity. I think you have some maturing to do
but I have a great deal of respect for what you've achieved in the hobby,
given your age.
Feel free to dislike me as much as you feel you need to, but don't flatter
yourself to think my actions are directed at you personally. I hardly ever
think about anyone but myself to that deep of a level. :-)
> and nothing will change that,
Except time. As you get older (as Tim says) you'll settle down.
> cause you started out on the wrong foot
> with me Larry, and next time a new member comes in remember that.
You can't go through life deciding that everyone that gets on your nerves is
your enemy. There are just too many annoying people out there for that
strategy to work. Billions of them, actually, if you *let* them annoy you.
I want to get back to the question I posed at the end of my last post, which
was posed more as a thought starter than as a comment on this particular
situation... what should groups do in situations where they don't want to
admit a member for whatever reason? It clearly engenders hard feelings
(again, c.f. NELUG). Any little white lie eventually comes unraveled. IS it
best to say nothing at all except "we made a policy decision" and leave it
at that?
(PNLTC has consistently refused to admit me as a member, for example,
claiming geography as the reason... I think it's really that they don't like
me. :-) <removes tongue from cheek> )
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: GMLTC
|
| (...) Well because you posted the question and referance NELUG twice I thought I should respond. First I hope you don't think NELUG ever lied or tried to cover up the fact that we had an over 18 rule. Quite the opposite in fact which I think is why (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: GMLTC
|
| SNipped (...) yes i do and i up hold my statement but i do not want tell you why to embarrass you and get insulting and i would need a .flame for that. (...) never was shouting, your just looking for something wrong with me. (...) I dont care any (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
