 | | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) So, how many models can be made from this set at the same time, or are we paying $100 for one engine model? -- Don (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) $100 for 1080 pieces, or a little under 10 cents per piece, seems to be a pretty typical price point.for sets. Since the motors are going for $20 through Factory, that would tack another $20 onto the price of the set...or require dropping (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Actually, the verbage on the NA box appears in English of course, but also in French and Spanish in smaller caracters. The verbage on the IN box appears in 12 languages, including English, French, Spanish, German, Italian, Dutch... (I will not (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Too bad... for 100USD (100EUR here in the old world) it should have a motor... with no motor this set gets too pricey. And I also think that the main image, picturing a motor, is misleading. I'm a bit disappointed. G. (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Gianluca Morelli" <poldoshop@yahoo.it> wrote in message news:JDoyM7.EJH@lugnet.com... (...) The motor is not included in the box. Look closely at this image: (URL) the lower right hand corner there is a picture of a 9v train motor and some track. (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
What about the motor? The swiss crocodile looks motorized, but there's no motor in the parts list... (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:JDowF1.G1y@lugnet.com... (...) I will go ahead and pre-answer one question which I am pretty sure someone will pose: Q: Why are their two versions of the box? A: Like many LEGO sets, (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
ILTCO has received some images of the new 10183 LEGO Hobby Train. (URL) you are not familiar with the LEGO Hobby Train (aka UTB), you can read some background information in this thread: (URL) first public announcement of the 10183 LEGO Hobby Train (...) (18 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains) !!
|
| |
| | Re: I have a dream...
|
|
(...) I've been corrected, there _is_ and 8-wide model pictured on the box, just not the front ;) (...) I'll see what kind of information I can get, but I just learned that there is a picture of the box on page 15 (17 in the pdf) of BrickJournal 6. (...) (18 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) I'm going to rely on my 9V trains simply for power and control. But, if LEGO want me to buy more IR stuff then they could consider the following: A 16-stud version of the IR base. They'd only need to re-mould the top part, then you could use (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Probably not, at least for enough years to matter to TLG's bottom line. My purchases are less than 1/10 of pre-Bley already without the TrackChange issue, but so far I've bought *TWO* "new" train sets (ones that involve the new track system, (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: I have a dream...
|
|
(...) any idea on what's in the inventory for this set? looks awsome btw. ondrew (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) actuly the ironic thing is lego is producing something like you described for the 2007 lineup. the dinosar and grader have an ir motor controler with a seperate motor and battery pac. the only down side is it's uncompatable with the old 9v (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) another hypothetical here: If lego or someone else was to produce a motor that matched the pulling power or was stronger than the current 9v motor and there was a system in place to suport the amp draw would that have any affect on your (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Again, I am someone who will never convert to the plain plastic, but I see the IR system being much more useful if the battery/receiver is unbundled from the baseplate. Ideally, I would like to have the IR receiver unbundled from both battery (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Not gonna happen until TLG brings out a motor that can handle remotely near the current motor, and maybe not even then. I already have too much money spent on rechargeable batteries, I'm not about to attempt to power a decent train with a (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) OK, well one really simple, almost trivial thing: you can run the IR train on the same track as the 9V, allowing you to have two trains going around a track in different directions, with just a quick timed siding excursion to let them pass and (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Before this goes way off on a tangent let me rephrase my question. What changes would you propose to the IR/RC train system to make it useful in a complementary way to the 9v system? I understand that some will never convert as they have (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
[Warning: non-train person elbowing into the conversation, so my viewpoint is... very different perhaps] (...) There are two issues I see being important for me: control and power (and yes, I know lots of reasons why it's best to do that through (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Personally, I'd use the plastic gray track rails before I'd use the plastic track compatible with the 9 volt track. I suppose it would be easy for TLG to make gentler curves using pieces such as those, but the point is mute for me. I'm with (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
