Subject:
|
Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:13:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3527 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Ondrew Hartigan wrote:
| |
...the IR/RC train system to make it useful
in a complementary way to the 9v system?
|
OK, well one really simple, almost trivial thing: you can run the IR train on
the same track as the 9V, allowing you to have two trains going around a track
in different directions, with just a quick timed siding excursion to let them
pass and not collide. I had two 9V trains running in one loop in the same
direction, with one stepping out into a siding to let the other pass every lap.
With the IR train, I can have a set-up like that running in two directions on
the same piece of track. OK, that actually takes no modification at all, but
it’s an example of where I’m thinking of heading with these things.
--
Brian Davis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
| (...) Before this goes way off on a tangent let me rephrase my question. What changes would you propose to the IR/RC train system to make it useful in a complementary way to the 9v system? I understand that some will never convert as they have (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
