To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 28637
28636  |  28638
Subject: 
Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
Followup-To: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:43:11 GMT
Viewed: 
12481 times
  
I’d like to pose a question that’s been bothering me lately. Since RC trains
made they’re debut last year many issues have risen with the product in its
current form. Mainly these are control and power issues but there are many other
quirks as well. Since plastic track seems to be here to stay, Common sense tells
me Lego is eventually going to kill off the 9v line. Knowing this, we as a
community need to think about eventually converting to plastic rails. This also
means now would be a great time to tell Lego what we need for plastic rails to
work for us.

  This leads me to my question; given the current IR RC train line what changes
do you see necessary for you to convert from 9v track to plastic track and why?


Ondrew



Message has 9 Replies:
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) Changes... NONE!! I have too much invested in 9v trains to convert to RC and plastic track. It is my belief that who can say in the next few years that TLG won't switch to another train line. They have gone from pre-- to 4.5v, to 12v, 9v and (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) Personally, I'd use the plastic gray track rails before I'd use the plastic track compatible with the 9 volt track. I suppose it would be easy for TLG to make gentler curves using pieces such as those, but the point is mute for me. I'm with (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
[Warning: non-train person elbowing into the conversation, so my viewpoint is... very different perhaps] (...) There are two issues I see being important for me: control and power (and yes, I know lots of reasons why it's best to do that through (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) Not gonna happen until TLG brings out a motor that can handle remotely near the current motor, and maybe not even then. I already have too much money spent on rechargeable batteries, I'm not about to attempt to power a decent train with a (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) Again, I am someone who will never convert to the plain plastic, but I see the IR system being much more useful if the battery/receiver is unbundled from the baseplate. Ideally, I would like to have the IR receiver unbundled from both battery (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) I'm going to rely on my 9V trains simply for power and control. But, if LEGO want me to buy more IR stuff then they could consider the following: A 16-stud version of the IR base. They'd only need to re-mould the top part, then you could use (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) **maniacal laughter** Bring back the 4.5 volt trains, with the good plastic track. That's what I'd like to see. And the cuuuuute little battery boxes! Bwah-hah-hah-hah-haaaaaah! Okay, seriously-- I never got the 9v train system; I sorta felt (...) (17 years ago, 20-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) Non-LEGO model railroaders have been scratch building power trains for decades. We should be able to come up with motored wheels and power pic-up (probably based on DCC). The big problem is the track. I think it will be possible to put metal (...) (17 years ago, 23-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
 
(...) A 9V track solution... I have been wondering about the problem of the 9V track myself. As I understand it, putting the metal on the track is very expensive for LEGO. And for some other company to build metal track to this gauge, they would (...) (17 years ago, 25-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)

20 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR