Subject:
|
Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 17 Feb 2007 05:22:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4136 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Thomas Stangl wrote:
> ondrew hartigan wrote:
> > This leads me to my question; given the current IR RC train line what changes
> > do you see necessary for you to convert from 9v track to plastic track and why?
>
> Not gonna happen until TLG brings out a motor that can handle remotely
> near the current motor, and maybe not even then. I already have too
> much money spent on rechargeable batteries, I'm not about to attempt to
> power a decent train with a zillion motors and batteries (which will
> wear out faster than normal as the motors fight each other).
another hypothetical here: If lego or someone else was to produce a motor that
matched the pulling power or was stronger than the current 9v motor and there
was a system in place to suport the amp draw would that have any affect on your
decicion?
ondrew
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
| (...) Probably not, at least for enough years to matter to TLG's bottom line. My purchases are less than 1/10 of pre-Bley already without the TrackChange issue, but so far I've bought *TWO* "new" train sets (ones that involve the new track system, (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
| (...) Not gonna happen until TLG brings out a motor that can handle remotely near the current motor, and maybe not even then. I already have too much money spent on rechargeable batteries, I'm not about to attempt to power a decent train with a (...) (18 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
