Subject:
|
Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:21:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*nogarbageplease*verizon.netSAYNOTOSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
4340 times
|
| |
|
|
Cedar Sith wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > <http://eurobricks.hosting.ipsyn.com/euroforum/index.php?showtopic=7336&pid=118662&st=75&#entry118662
> > Scroll down>
> >
> > Tim
>
> I'm not much of a train expert but I do like this new piece.
>
> Could it be possible to use four of these wires (One for each of the four
> possible options, 2 straight, 2 curves )
> http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemPic.asp?P=5306b
>
> To jumper between the metal tracks and then run two motors on the train, one on
> the front and one on rear. The wires would keep the connection open and while
> the one motor was on the plastic switch the other motor would still have power?
>
> Brian
Interesting idea. I wonder how long a train would have to be to make it
through the switch using your proposal. Maybe I'll experiment latter
tonight.
Chris
--
http://mysite.verizon.net/cjmasi/lego/
Learn about brittle bone disease
http://www.oif.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
| (...) I'm not much of a train expert but I do like this new piece. Could it be possible to use four of these wires (One for each of the four possible options, 2 straight, 2 curves ) (URL) jumper between the metal tracks and then run two motors on (...) (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
