Subject:
|
Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:25:21 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjmasi@*nogarbageplease*verizon#AvoidSpam#.net
|
Viewed:
|
4337 times
|
| |
|
|
David VinZant wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
> > > In lugnet.trains, Timothy Gould wrote:
> > > > <http://eurobricks.hosting.ipsyn.com/euroforum/index.php?showtopic=7336&pid=118662&st=75&#entry118662
> > > > Scroll down>
> > > >
> > > > Tim
[...]
> After looking at the pictures it got me thinking. If you had two main lines and
> ran the trains in the same direction. One train would jump to the other main
> line. As the track only has one toggle for two switches on each end. Thus
> causing one switch to be open and the other closed. Unless there is a dead spot
> allowing for the switch to be open on both tracks. It would be nice to have
> separate toggles for each switch.
>
> Dave
> www.GPLR.org
Thanks Dave, that hadn't occurred to me. My first thought was, "Cool,
you only have to worry about setting one switch", rather than, "Huh, you
can't set each switch independently." Actually, my first thought was
"Pussbucket! We're never going to get that piece."
Chris
--
http://mysite.verizon.net/cjmasi/lego/
Learn about brittle bone disease
http://www.oif.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Prepare to cry: 2007 train pics
|
| (...) After looking at the pictures it got me thinking. If you had two main lines and ran the trains in the same direction. One train would jump to the other main line. As the track only has one toggle for two switches on each end. Thus causing one (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
