Subject:
|
Re: Bogie design (coupler)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:22:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2202 times
|
| |
|
|
M. Moolhuysen <moom@NOSPAM-chello.nl> wrote in message
news:HpCB4D.F1D@lugnet.com...
> > In lugnet.trains, Sonnich Jensen wrote:
> > I do agree that the 1x4 plate is funny here, but it also have me another
> > idea: it would be great if it was possible to move in it as close to the
> > bogie body, and the constructions becomes one stud longer (3 studs of • the
> > 1x4 under the 1x5).
>
> Ah, suddenly I do understand what you ment here, but unfortunately this • would
> not fit. A 4263 Technic Plate 1 x 4 with Holes under the 2711 Technic • Rotor 2
> Blade with 2 Studs (with one hole and 2 studs overlap, and only the other • hole
> extending) would require for the innermost round end of the 4263 Technic • Plate
> 1 x 4 with Holes, to lean against the studs of the 9V Train Wheel, and • the
> diameter of the round end is to large for this. It's diameter is the same • as the
> narrow rim on a 4073 Plate 1 x 1 Round, and this "overlaps" the studs • around
> it.
I am sure there is a way around that problem. I just need to find it. (and I
have some ideas)
> That's why I suggested the 2905 Technic Triangle in my pervious post, • measured
> along it's shortest axis it's only 3 studs long.
I noticed that, and will look at that too.
Best regards
Sonnich
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bogie design (coupler)
|
| (...) Ah, suddenly I do understand what you ment here, but unfortunately this would not fit. A 4263 Technic Plate 1 x 4 with Holes under the 2711 Technic Rotor 2 Blade with 2 Studs (with one hole and 2 studs overlap, and only the other hole (...) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
