| |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> Overall, I think what you've begun here is a great example for other clubs who
> might want to "evolve" some day into more complex layout schemes.
I agree. J2 and I both know this is actually starting to happen, since we're
on so many other clubs' mailing lists. I won't name names as it's their
perogative to announce it as they see fit, but a number of clubs ARE
thinking about ways to be a little less flat without losing some of the
flexibility inherent in plywood layouts.
Is that cool or what?
I share J2's concern about reducing the setup/assembly time somewhat though.
It looked to me that you've traded setup time for brick quantity (something
sturdy enough to travel already assembled takes a lot more bricks than your
support structure uses, presumably)
Thanks for sharing this.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
