Subject:
|
Re: My Sante Fe 10020
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:35:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2031 times
|
| |
|
|
I am a purist in a sense, but I dislike Lego stickers all together. I had
to put some on this model, but I wanted to be "different". I still have my
limited edition. numbers intact in the original packaging. I hacked up the
ones that came with the engine (301 and 27). And if that still dousn't ease
your mind, then I have another 10020 still in the box (less the limited
numbers - which I had to take out to see what number it was).
-Rob
"Kurt Eilers" <keilers@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:3C78C8E9.1EBDC67E@qwest.net...
> Rob - That is a great idea. However, will you still be able to keep the • original
> number in tact? As a reforming purist, this makes me a touch edgy. When • mine
> arrive they will be built in due time and retain their markings. My • thought was
> to do it this way so my kids can enjoy the rich history of this engine and • Lego
> Rail.
>
> - Kurt
>
> Rob Hendrix wrote:
>
> > I will not be taking my numbers out of their packaging, and I didn't • want to
> > have the same numbers on my engine as everyone else (301 or 27). Here • is
> > what I came up with after doing a little cutting on the stickers from • the
> > 10020:
> >
> > http://www.cei.net/~rhendrix/images/SF377.jpg
> >
> > I guess thats one way of getting my membership number on a SF!
> >
> > -Rob
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: My Sante Fe 10020
|
| Rob - That is a great idea. However, will you still be able to keep the original number in tact? As a reforming purist, this makes me a touch edgy. When mine arrive they will be built in due time and retain their markings. My thought was to do it (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
