 | | Re: Thinking of selling my entire 9V collection
|
|
To Michael... If you are looking for prices, fine, but if you want offers, I beleive you are off topic for this group. "Best offer" deals belong in lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade. Auctions, which is what I would characterise what you're doing now with (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) How can I like you better than I do now? You're already aces in my book. (...) Mostly imported except for the power unit. There was a big write up on it in Trains a while back... Acela is way way behind schedule though. (...) Sounds workable. (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) need (...) The black nose comes from this set 6473 - RES-Q Cruiser (URL) set 6473 does not come with the trans yellow "Y" shaped headlight insert. later, James Mathis (...) a (...) two (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Thinking of selling my entire 9V collection
|
|
I have just watched a auction with a 4558, the winning bid was $276 (URL) this sound right for a 4558, bear in mind what is the vaule of a 4558 with a 4547 and both have good boxs? -- Michael - - - Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk - - - - - - (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Thinking of selling my entire 9V collection
|
|
I am "thinking" (I might or i might not) of selling my entire 9V collection So please can i have some prices or offers on the following trains I have 2126 2150 3225 4525x2 4531x2 4532 4539x9 i think 3 are Mint 4537x2 4539 4544x2 4546x2 4547x2 4551x2 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble
|
|
I just purchased a few three foot high trees for my back yard. They cost about $40. I guess I will have to return them to the nursery and say "Nope! Nope! These trees are too small. I need trees that are at least 20 feet tall. A guy on the Internet (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
Hey, that train has a black nose - what sets did the black nose come in? I need one! Or is it the 4561 nose/plate? (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) Will you like me ("beter"?) if I can make a likeness of the Amtrak version of the Talgo? This Eurotrash has dumped on US soil! Is the Acela a native US design, or imported (partial?) technology? (...) Uhm...thanks? ;-) (...) I think a lot of (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
What a compliment. Nobody makes beter Eurotrash! I am laughing so hard it is hard to type. Thanks Larry, Crhsi (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble was: Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
(...) What is wrong with larger scenery and buildings? You should check out Legoland sometime;-) Seriously, you don't have to build ginormous structures-- we are still talking MF scale here. I will now *have* to take some photos of my double stall (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
NOBODY makes better eurotrash passenger than James. Nobody. Each of his creations tops the last. Wow. A Talgo train! Who would have thunk it. What a clever mechanism. And in only 6 wide to boot. Now pendularize it! :-) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) So you think I should start on a CAD talgo? or the lighted nose piece? Doing a whole train set is hard, but if I start with my amt 2000 and do other cars from there well.. maybe as for working for TLC, yep if i did jr would be no more, i cant (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Another 6wide/8wide ramble was: Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
Your right, I'm against 8 wide and havn't built any 8 wide. Why not? Lots of reasons: 1) 8 wide demands larger scenery and buildings. If your logic for building 8 wide is because LEGO minifig trucks are 6 wide then you should make all your buildings (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
Jason Brown wrote in message <38B42F60.9B907B00@m...es.edu>... (...) never (...) comment on (...) Yep, of course the 4.5V being battery operated will work on ANY track! I assume you can combine 12V and 9V if you don't use any turnouts or crossings, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
BEEEG Snip but im working on racing models so (...) Ah come on I really want to see it,beautiful work, simply stunning, now if we could only get you a job with TLCs new product design dept. (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Likeness of a Talgo: Shared monoaxle
|
|
(...) A talga is a challenge, seeing photos of it, the engine could be 6 bricks and 2 plates high, followed by a 28 size car , say.. 4 bricks high? or cut chassis custom built, with "wings" in front, behind the engine,: ___...___ //_/ | |\________ (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
(...) Just going to pop in here: The gauges are indeed the same, or close enough. My 4.5v will run on 9v no prob (well, I swapped the motor with the 9v, but the cars work just fine), and 9v cars will work on 4.5v track. And I belive that 12v is (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains?
|
|
(...) Not to be picky, but there have been 3 voltages: 4.5v, 9v, and 12v. I've never seen any 12v and played with 4.5v once, a long time ago, so I can't comment on the gauge of the different tracks. Ben Roller (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
|
Christopher Masi <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message news:38B46A14.581C66...ane.edu... (...) but (...) stuff I (...) her 8 (...) brainer (...) See comment below (...) but (...) SD40-2 (...) look (...) thought (...) which (...) thought (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
