 | | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) [snip] I also just picked up my first Bionicle sets recently. I purchased 4 of the Toa. I like the new elements introduced in this line. The feet pieces are much nicer than the throwbot feet. The torso gearbox looks like it can be (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
I agree with John here. I should be replying to these posts as i have some of the answers that some of you are questioning about, like: will Bionicle be around next year ? = Yes and bigger and better You could have alook at this picture of my (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) The missing element is 'Technic Function'. If Bionicle sets are like the Slizers, the only function they have is a wheel (small gear) that you turn to make the head go up and down. Not exactly high-function, y'know? Steve (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) But previous technic sets at similar price points are equally low in function. Look at all the mini technic sets that fall between three and five dollars. Most are equipped with one function ( a wheel-driven propellar for example). Or look at (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) For that matter, several of the Rahi sets coming out later this year do have treads and shock absorbers. The frames of the larger Rahi sets are made mostly from square Technic beams, rounded Technic beams, and Technic plates. They're not as (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jonathan LILL (<GE62ss.K6K@lugnet.com>) wrote at 21:10:04 (...) And I didn't buy those either. :-) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) <set:7191> has: numerous technic gears: 8t, 16t, 24t, 12t beveled technic cross axles: in various lengths and colors technic friction pegs (including #3 friction peg) technic bushings (both regular and 1/2 wide) technic catches plus many many (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) I'm wondering whether you would argue that the UCS Tie Fighter was not Technic if it had been released as a Technic set. A Technic set contains Technic elements and is released under the Technic name by TLC. Bionicle sets fall in this (...) (23 years ago, 30-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) I think it's obvious that it's a 'Model Team' set by nature. I have only 3 Model Team sets but I got the impression that all of them contain at least some Technic elements and have some functions. What differentiates this line from the Technic (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Neither do I. But the Throwbots/RoboRiders/Bionicle have something the other <$10 technic sets do not - a coolness factor. Obviously not everyone has a soft spot for action figures or robotic-looking things. But I do. And three years ago when (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) There's a simple test, has it got a transparent windscreen, Yes!! then it can't possibly be Technic. Also Technic sets are always built in a skeletal framework style, while the UCS Tie Fighter is a solid form. I thougt we'd agreed Bionicle (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Despite being keen for Lego to keep Technic 'traditional' and basically agreeing with you, I can't let you get away with this test. Technic Universal set 8020 has a transparent windscreen and I think it was one of the best value universals (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Yeah, it's a cool set! I like the use of technic functions in small vehicles. There aren't that many technic functions available in the set, but it's still an interesting package. Fredrik (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) We have agreed on that, several times, but certain parties want to make sure nobody forgets it. Here are the issues as I see them. Should the Techbots (Slizer, Roboriders, Bionicle) be in Lugnet's technic section? Yes, because that's where (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Must be the exception that proves the rule :-( Grumble, grumble. Only joking :-) Steve (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Please, oh please, tell me that the Technic Pit Droid is an exception. (...) Which, of course, is why this whole argument is completely pointless and everyone who posted in this thread is insane (especially me). Not that there's anything wrong (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) In other words, almost every Technic Formula 1 racer ever released (not sure whether this includes the Silver Champion) is not actually a Technic set? (...) Well, the main problem with that is that when you get right down to it, nobody really (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Yes, but did you deny their Technic-ness? -Andrusi && (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Oh yeah, thank you for reminding me! I actually don't have the pit droid, so I really can't comment on it, but it does seem simpler. (...) I'll add my name under the 'insane' category, thank you for pointing out the pointlessness... :-) - (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
<snip> (...) I submit in evidence: (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) But the question is still open for the rest of them... - David (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) I could write Technic across my butt! it still wouldn't be Technic though. Technic in name only! Steve (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Oh, I don't know about that. If your butt came out of a press in Billund, it could very well reflect the spirit of Technic. (Technicicity?) But of course, it was LEGO who wrote 'Technic' across the lid-that-is-a-wheel. It's possible to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Ooh! Ooh! That's my favorite Police album! Matt (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) I don't know about you, but (t) at least in my case the main point of my butt is it's functions and not it's looks or anything else, so I guess it is 'Technic' in spirit after all! :-) - David (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
Well, thanks for making me laugh out loud in my cubicle at work... :-) -Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Arnon" <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> To: <lugnet.technic@lugnet.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:20 PM Subject: Re: (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Looks Great! Your collection is most impressive and the display is awsome! I'd like to know how you went about gathering the many colors. In particular, where do the Vahi and Infected come from? I am especially impressed by your "interactive" (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) Function: He has a "storage mode" similar to the battle droid, except it looks nothing like the storage mode of the pit droid from the movie. When you push his nose in, he supposedly springs out into position like the one Jar Jar Binks (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle going away?
|
|
(...) O.o I must be a Technic set--my main point has to be my functions, 'cause it sure ain't my looks... -Andrusi && (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
