Subject:
|
Re: Technicopedia
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:07:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9481 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Stephane Simard wrote:
> Congratulations on a most excellent site, I spent about an hour browsing it
> yesterday and I only went to a quarter of it. If you do complete it, it promises
> to be one of my favorite site.
>
> A comment though on your supercars section: should you only include the big cars
> that have a working gearbox? And why isn't 8466 Off Roader not included?
> Technically, it does everything the 8448 does, and it's the last true "supercar"
> (Or "superSUV", whatever you wanna call it )
I admit that the categorization is fairly arbitrary. LEGO doesn't put any of
these into any categories at all (except Artic Action). The primary purpose of
the categories is to be able to compare sets which have similar features or
similar subjects. The site doesn't really do that right now because I have not
posted most of the comparisons yet, but they are in work right now! I should
have them done (for the categories so far started) by Monday. I have so far
completed (but not posted) motorcycles, super cars, bulldozers, cranes, and
tractors.
8466 is a tough one. I have it in the 4x4 category because that is the subject
of the model, but by functionality it belongs with the Super Cars. Maybe I'll
put it in both. Thanks for the idea.
Of course, I've already taken the "Super Car" photos and I'm feeling kind of
lazy, so we'll see what happens!
Eric
blakbird
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Technicopedia
|
| Congratulations on a most excellent site, I spent about an hour browsing it yesterday and I only went to a quarter of it. If you do complete it, it promises to be one of my favorite site. A comment though on your supercars section: should you only (...) (17 years ago, 21-Nov-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
