 | | Re: 8464
|
|
Hello William (...) one (...) Thanks for the link! And it is even in the same province: Noord Brabant... Greetings Maico Arts (23 years ago, 23-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: What is the alternate set for the Forklift set (8248/8463)?
|
|
It's a tow truck with a car lift thing on the back (uses the forks as the lift) I can scan the small picture if you like William -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Bob Parker Sent: 22 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | What is the alternate set for the Forklift set (8248/8463)?
|
|
What is the alternate set that can be built with the following set: Forklift <set:8248>/<set:8463> Thanks in advance, - Bob PS - I'm already going through Brickshelf instruction scan library withdrawal! (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Where can I order specific Technic service pack? (Canada)
|
|
(...) Hi Dave, Have you thought of putting in a wanted request at Bricklink.com? (I'm not familiar with Technic parts, so AFAIK what you need may even be available on the site now.) Maggie C. (x-posted to .technic where they DO know what you are (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Teaser05 and 06
|
|
Gali: Sorry I'm late. Kopaka: Here, I have made copies of everyone's images they brought. Gali, give me the one you brought so I can copy that one too. Gali: Here. (URL) Here's mine too Kopaka. (URL) Ok everyone should have six image copies. One of (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) In a way your right, your saying the "look" of Technic has changed and that we have to change our building style. But this isn't the actual problem as far as I'm concerned. Almost all the great builders on this forum combine technic with (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) Before we canonise him, lets just remember that’s his job. He wants us to be happy with him and buy lots of bricks. Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
Having followed all the discussion on this topic, I have finally decided to add my two cents worth. I have decided that the Technic line has now evolved into a different toy, and for many of us having being used to the "traditional" Technic, it has (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) So you do think LEGO's got it right? (...) Are you serious? "...if it were my company I would use it...and try to remedy" implies fairly strongly that what you suggest is (in your mind) different to what's happening now. And the overwhelmingly (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) I believe they're doing exactly that. Did my comments lead you to believe that I felt otherwise? (...) I think it's an excellent tool for all kinds of market data. It's a completely open arena. It's pure supply and demand. But in the end you (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) And you think they're not doing that already? IIRC the Guarded Inn was pretty popular on eBay... ...and the Metroliner was fairly popular... (...and cypress trees and train doors if you want to consider parts as well as sets). Cheers Richie (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) I wouldn't even begin to compare it to their total retail sales. I don't believe I did. If I gave that impression, then my mistake. However, I stand by my point that were it my company I would use it as a guage of what might be missing from my (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) Compared to their total retail sales, my guess would be that it is indeed incosequential. Just an opinion, of course! ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) Given the sheer volume of LEGO that goes through eBay in any given week I would find it hard to label it as inconsequential. As a business person I would see it as a part of my own market that was being eroded by my inability to meet customer (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | anyone got an inventory of the 8465 Extreme Off Roader?
|
|
I am considering what to ask for for my bday and I want to find out whats in this set before I decide what to ask for. (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Excavator Pics
|
|
For those who'd rather see (poor) photos of the built thing, I've uploaded some William (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: VP of lego direct Q&A Transcript
|
|
(...) lol inconsequential. They could sell (...) Priorities. Whether we agree with it or not, LD has stated that they can only offer so much at a time. So what gets offered and what doesn't? To you, the decision to offer technic beams is a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8458 Suspension Parts
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Gaurav Thakur writes: <snip> (...) There's currently 8 on Bricklink: (URL) they're expensive! TJ (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
Some great points have been made here. I actually really like most of the new parts (particularly the various axle connectors), but it does seem that the functionality of the average Technic model is less advanced than that of five years ago. The (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 8458 Suspension Parts
|
|
I can't answer your question, but there's one other thing you might also try. There is a third type of shock absorber with a spring rate in between the light gray and yellow shocks. These are the dark-gray* shocks. They may turn out to be sufficient (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
