 | | Are "classic" technic parts doomed?
|
|
Is TLS abandoning the classic "Technic" design concept completely? Looking at the new "Technic" sets, it seems that TLC continues its abandonment of the older "classic" Technic concept using holed beams and plates - replacing these with the newer (...) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic) !
|
| |
| | Another render of set 8458
|
|
I made another render of the Silver Champion. I made several tweaks but it's still not where I want it (though it only took 2 days to render instead of 11). Check it out here: (warning 1MB pictue) (URL) (21 years ago, 13-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Lego MOC Web Pages
|
|
(URL) Maxwell" <r34_v@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HD7Ju0.G1C@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) you (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Airplane wing
|
|
(...) I am getting much inspiration from early flight pioneers. Their contraptions are fun and fascinating to watch, even those that did not fly. Mostly their designs are more easily translated to Lego. (...) I have been trying flex tube as cross (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | WOW, new heavy haulage and machinery LEGO site on-line (by Harald Ziegler)
|
|
Today I went to the Modelshow Europe with some LEGO-models. The show really was great, but I will tell you more about it in a next message. About two years ago I met Harald Ziegler from Germany on the Modelshow Europe. He was there as a visitor. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.build, lugnet.technic) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Airplane wing
|
|
(...) wings... Regards, Paul (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Airplane wing
|
|
(...) Actually, he's an early flight pioneer... (URL) I misspelled the mess out of his name! (...) You're on the right track! The only thingthat comes to mind right now is to use flex tubing where possible to substitute for technic axles. That would (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Airplane wing
|
|
"Joe Meno" <jmenomeno@aol.com> wrote in message news:HD8qBu.1FuG@lugnet.com... (...) wing. (...) atached a (...) am (...) with (...) Made in LEGO? I dont think I heard of the name before... Do you have any info on the web about him? (...) it (...) (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Airplane wing
|
|
(...) Nice construction! Reminds me of the gliders made by Otto Lithenthal. While I initially was one of the "what are you thinking?" people on this, it hit me that a glider could be done using the methods you're using. To get a motor, though.... My (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Airplane wing
|
|
Happy easter hollidays! Now I've at last got time to finish the first version of an airplane wing. It had an wingspan of 133cm and the weight was 460gram. And when I atached a light body and tailplane it glided a bit, but it was a bit too heavy so I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) The motor I'm using is a Maxon RE-max 29, and because you've never heard of it, here's a pdf. :) ftp://ftp.maxonmotor..._141_e.pdf It's model number 226752. Dimensions are in the pdf file. The motor would normally cost ~ 80€, but I asked for a (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Make Your Own HiTechnic Style Radio Control?
|
|
(...) (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | what happened to hitechnic?
|
|
my question is simply this- what happened to hitechnic? (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Make Your Own HiTechnic Style Radio Control?
|
|
Has anyone come up with a radio control transmitter and receiver similar in style and use as the discontinued HiTechnic products? I had planned to purchase some HiTechnic parts for my models, but as they have been dicontinued, I have no idea what to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Making Lego MOC Web Pages
|
|
Are there any specific things I should know about making a web page to display my Lego MOCs? Do I have to post any statement saying that I am not affiliated with Lego, my views don't necessarily represent Lego's, etc.? Also, does anyone care if I (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Minifig scale snow plow, motorized
|
|
Hi all! Call it tiny, call it pathetic, call it cute, here is my first real MOC since the end of my dark ages (oct 2002). Thanks to Tim Strutt for kindly taking this photo and movie at the MONLUG train show. The vehicle is very slow, due to the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) Can you provide the dimensions of the motor, or possibly the exact brand/model of the motor? What did you have to do to connect it to the 9V Lego Battery box (cutting of wires, soldering, etc.) ? Thanks for the info. MM (21 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about set 8094
|
|
"Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message news:HD6HJ9.15w7@lugnet.com... (...) Well I own that set and it is a felt tip pen. With a pretty hard tip on it. A good pen actually. Not used it much, but I still have the pen and it works. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about set 8094
|
|
Adrian Egli's utterance expressed in news:HD6r5v.244G@lugnet.com: (...) A4 is 297 mm * 210 mm A3 is 210 mm * 148 mm which is 8.25 in. by 5.8 in. so.. it is pretty close to the metric A3-format. Leg godt! (21 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about set 8094
|
|
"Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au> wrote in message news:HD6HJ9.15w7@lugnet.com... (...) I suppose you could call it a felt-ball point (?) because you can't see the felt but uses the same type of ink as one (dries quick). (...) The paper (...) (21 years ago, 11-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
