Subject:
|
Re: Drawers vs tilt-bins and scratching?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Sat, 19 May 2001 22:36:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3537 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.storage, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> I agree about drawers, i don't use them and would find them maddening as
> well. Where I went wrong is that much of my larger parts are in the shoebox
> bins which I keep vertically stacked (nested) on shelving. I am constantly
> going and getting parts out of them, stacking and restacking. Big waste of
> time. But in order to have all of them spread out around me, it would
> require 2-300 square feet of table space. So still not workable. Vertical
> *is* the way to go. Just not the way I went.
I do the same with the larger parts...the vertical nesting stacks. I have to
do the same, always running to the shelfs. Drives me nuts. I also have about
twenty Plano thin, clear boxes (with lids) for the smaller parts. That
helps, but still always running back and forth to get the appropriate parts.
My biggest problem is my small apartment in NYC that *requires* I put
everything away when I am done building. Oh to have an empty basement!
Jake
---
Jake McKee
AFOL
LUGNET Member #211
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Drawers vs tilt-bins and scratching?
|
| (...) So it sounds like the key is having a big enough worktable so you can have the likely trays out and available as you do your design run? (...) I agree about drawers, i don't use them and would find them maddening as well. Where I went wrong is (...) (24 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.storage)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
