Subject:
|
Re: Drawers vs tilt-bins and scratching?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.storage
|
Date:
|
Sat, 19 May 2001 06:03:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3221 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.storage, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> No one should have a system that requires (or allows?) drawers to be
> opened hundreds of times a day. That sort of thing is easily avoided.
I'd like to hear more about this if it's not confidential. When I am free
building or designing something new (as opposed to doing a production run
where I am working from a parts list) I don't always know how much of what I
will end up needing. Since I hate sorting, I tend to not get huge gobs of
everything out because it means a bigger pile to re-sort later. That implies
that i go back to the same place more than once... not *hundreds* of times,
but several, anyway.
What am I doing wrong?
An efficient sorting and storage system makes for efficient designing but I
haven't found my highest efficiency yet...
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Drawers vs tilt-bins and scratching?
|
| (...) In a tilt-bin setup, bins get opened only once (they stay open) no matter how many times parts are taken from them. They can also be removed. In a tray system, as at TLC, the entire drawer is a compartmentalized tray (aprox 24x30x3). It gets (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.storage)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Drawers vs tilt-bins and scratching?
|
| (...) I don't think the issue of tilt shift causing wear is one worthy of consideration unless it's the only consideration. That said, I could argue that under certain working conditions, there would actually be less shifting with a tilt system. But (...) (23 years ago, 19-May-01, to lugnet.storage)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
