Subject:
|
Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:47:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
769 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Nicholas Fezie writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> > I don't think LEGO ever said that, no.
> > eric
>
> Actually, Lego did say that in an interview over at FBTB (for the link go to
> http://news.lugnet.com/starwars). And I think this is an imperial year.
Who at LEGO said that?
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
| (...) Actually, Lego did say that in an interview over at FBTB (for the link go to (URL) And I think this is an imperial year. There are no rebel sets (besides the escape pod which isn't from Episode 1 by the way). So the year couldn't get any more (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
