Subject:
|
Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:19:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
868 times
|
| |
|
|
> From: thomas weigle <ktw@ya-ba.net>
<snip>
> Now, if TLG could only produce playsets more
> consistently... It would be great with smaller DS playsets that could be
> combined to create bigger dioramas...
Yeah! That would be very cool. Maybe 4 or 5 small sets with Technic
connectors, and perhaps one larger set with a "landing bay" for the Falcon
or TIEs.
~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
| (...) The brilliant aspect of such sets is that they in a way become easier for kids to collect, and that the initial step would basically force parents into buying more of them later on. From a marketing perspective, very smart. From a collectors' (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
| (...) Their license runs to 2007, doesn't it? We'll probably see Ep4-6 sets for the remainder of that time, with sets for the new movies being promoted more heavily just after release of the movies. And the bigger sets seem to come later in the (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
