Subject:
|
Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:27:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Rick Hallman wrote:
> That stinks. We need a ... minifig scale ATAT. with 2 pilots, 10 ST, and an
> officer (Veers).
What would you be willing to pay for that 13 minifig set, which should be
roughly twice the size of the Falcon in order not to piss people off
because of lacking scale etc?
With a little luck, we'll get an AT-AT with some minifigs.
And I'm willing to bet the money I intend to spend on the DSDK that loads
of people will complain about size, features, colors, etc...
Which is really why Lego is MOCable. ;-)
> Very weak.
Apart from the AT-AT, what other Imperial sets should they have made?
> Dear Lego....Get the clue. We don't want watto! We want..err..Stormtroopers!!
Yes, apparently a lot of "heavy" users want stormtroopers.
I bet some kids want Watto, though...
Just as lots of kids wanted Jar-jar.
T.
--> thomas weigle | w.i.m.p.
web: http://www.ya-ba.net/
------------------------------>
.iMMersE your soUL in LOVE.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Jason Fabisch (30-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Eric Joslin (30-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Nicholas Fezie (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Thomas Weigle (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Mark Sandlin (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Thomas Weigle (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -James Simpson (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Jason Fabisch (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -James Simpson (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Bryan Hodges (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Todd Lehman (2-Nov-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Rick Hallman (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Andrew Tyrone (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|