To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 9596
9595  |  9597
Subject: 
Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:42:31 GMT
Viewed: 
792 times
  
Mark Sandlin wrote:

Yeah! That would be very cool. Maybe 4 or 5 small sets with Technic
connectors, and perhaps one larger set with a "landing bay" for the Falcon
or TIEs.

The brilliant aspect of such sets is that they in a way become easier for
kids to collect, and that the initial step would basically force parents
into buying more of them later on.

From a marketing perspective, very smart. From a collectors' perspective,
very cool. :-)

That is, of course, if they don't want to give us a $2000 Executer...

T.
--> thomas weigle  |  w.i.m.p.
    web: http://www.ya-ba.net/
------------------------------>
  .iMMersE your soUL in LOVE.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
 
(...) <snip> (...) Yeah! That would be very cool. Maybe 4 or 5 small sets with Technic connectors, and perhaps one larger set with a "landing bay" for the Falcon or TIEs. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)

14 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR