Subject:
|
Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:44:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
510 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
So I look at the new sets and I see two Imperial craft, 3 if you count the
AT-ST, which doesn't even come with an Imperial Officer or Pilot. The Junk
Shop and Droid Transport can't count as it's the wrong movie. So that leads
us with 2 ships, the TIE and the Shuttle. A little weak if you ask me. And
don't get me started with the Technic Stormtrooper. They should have done a
Technic RD2D(not Mindstorms) with the C3PO, and continued to work on the
Stormtrooper for a little while longer. Maybe later in the year they will
announce a few more sets, one can only hope. :( And where is our big set for
the year, it's not the Junkshop, is it?
Jason F.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
14 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Eric Joslin (30-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Nicholas Fezie (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Thomas Weigle (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Mark Sandlin (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Thomas Weigle (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -James Simpson (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Jason Fabisch (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -James Simpson (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Bryan Hodges (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Todd Lehman (2-Nov-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Rick Hallman (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Thomas Weigle (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?" -Andrew Tyrone (31-Oct-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|