Subject:
|
Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:03:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
752 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Thomas Weigle writes:
>
> If they follow this schedule, we should be able to expect bigger stuff
> towards mid 2001... Again, hopefully including some UCS stuff.
I'm convinced that we're going to see a UCS A-Wing, maybe even next. Compact
design. Maybe 700 pieces. Can be done in red and white, so cheap to produce
with existing stock. Not many new molds necessary; maybe just a canopy.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
| (...) I agree with you, but I think they will release them in pairs, like the Xwing and Tie Interceptor. These two are not comparable in performance as the TIE-Interceptor was designed to go against the Awing, so they are not pairing them up by a (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Didn't Lego state is was to be an "Imperial Year?"
|
| (...) Their license runs to 2007, doesn't it? We'll probably see Ep4-6 sets for the remainder of that time, with sets for the new movies being promoted more heavily just after release of the movies. And the bigger sets seem to come later in the (...) (24 years ago, 31-Oct-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
