Subject:
|
Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Oct 2001 18:34:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
434 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > However just because they are advertising it as a Rebel Blockade Runner,
> > doesn't mean it is the Tantive IV. Which is the only one we saw. (Or was
> > it? There might have been another in the attack on either Death Star, I
> > would have to go watch the movies again to be sure.) But anyhow, I would be
> > suprised to find out that the only RBR they rebellion had was the Tantive IV.
>
> The Rebel Blockade Runner was the rebel callsign (codename) of the Tantive IV.
> There was only one Rebel Blackade Runner. The RBR was a Correllian Corvette,
> which was used by the Empire and the Rebellion. So if TLC is advertising the
> Corvette as the RBR then it is a model of the Tantive IV.
>
> -Mike Petrucelli
Well I stand corrected. After reading your post, I went and looked it up, and
indeed I was wrong. I be taking my foot out of my mouth now.
-Jason
http://www.geocities.com/spearjr/brickcentral.html
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pics up for the RBR and Maul at S@H
|
| (...) suprised (...) The Rebel Blockade Runner was the rebel callsign (codename) of the Tantive IV. There was only one Rebel Blackade Runner. The RBR was a Correllian Corvette, which was used by the Empire and the Rebellion. So if TLC is advertising (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
