 | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
That depends on your definition of POOP. If you define it as Piece Of One Purpose, then it fits the bill... I was defining it as such. ~Mark (...) the back (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers
|
|
(...) It is possible they intend for it to be Luke standing in front of the Emperor to make it a sort of movie "mini-scene." I don't think they meant the photo of the Emperor to be a depiction of the minifig in front of the photo, since five of the (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers
|
|
(...) ...probably an error by the marketing department, however. I doubt the actual set will ship with a photo of the Emperor for Luke's stand. I wouldn't recommend buying it hoping there's a mistake, you'll probably be disappointed. I'm anxiously (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | SW mini-fig 3-pack OFFICIAL set numbers
|
|
(...) Just got off the phone with S@H (had to order the 7181 and 7190...dang, I hate waiting for payday), and asked about these mini-figs. The are real, they just aren't being backordered from TLC yet. I've read about how they'll be cheaper from S@H (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Please explain how you can make this Piece Out of Other Pieces. Use the back of the paper if you need extra room. I don't think you actually can. eric (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Pics of Millennium Falcon
|
|
(...) Selçuk (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
My beefs aren't with scale. I realize that TLG couldn't make this thing big enough, because it would just cost too much. I stand by my comments, however, on the matters of: - color... once again, light blue?!?! why not more dark gray? [Cost to fix (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
I'd buy a UCS MF and pay up to $500 as long as it was done RIGHT. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Feh. I actually like the thing. I liked it in preliminary photos, and I still like it. Granted, I wouldn't consider it even CLOSE to being the end-all be-all of Falcon MOCs, but for parts it's stunning. Even the saucer sections look useful! (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
The only falcon that was 40% too small was the one used in the first film (which incidentally, the set for was in my town :) the ones in the other films were the right size. alot of information about the millenium falcon is here: (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Hmm... Why would R2D2 have need for an inflatable Leia? If anyone had a reason to have one, that would be R4D5, but he isn't included with the set. Or maybe that isn't the case... Ol' Obi-Wan is probably just doing some of his cross dressing (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) it (...) Death (...) island (...) How do you know it is not an inflatable Leia? "It's not my nose, it's a false one," MPFC: Holy Grail Aaron (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Hello, I think it is okay for LEGO to make toys that are for kids and enjoyable to the collector crowd. I will give credit to LEGO for the model they have given us on both the toy and collector side. As a toy it satisfies all of the play (...) (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) leia, it would have obi wan instead. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) like I (...) resource for (...) Hey, good idea, except how do you know that the set isn't going *to* the Death Star :) Ah well, you can get (old) Obi-Wan's in a relatively cheap set, so I wouldn't be worrying. And another thing, Obi Wan didn't (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) I hate to tell you this, but obi wan died during the fight on the death star, therefore he isnt on the falcon in this case. (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
Well I have said it before and I guess I have to say it again. The external scale of the life-sized falcon used in the movies is 40 percent smaller than the internal sets that were used. TLC's falcon is a near perfect external scale. Of course this (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) And where's Obi-Wan? I could have sworn he was on it. =P -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Of course there are people here who would buy it. The real question is, are there *enough* people in the world at large to make it worth designing, marketing, soliciting, producing, and shipping? Probably not. Anyone who is disappointed with (...) (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion
|
|
(...) Umm, yes. A UCS MF would be horrible expensive, but I'm guessing it'd be over 2500-3000 pieces. That's a lot. -Chris (24 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
