To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *10163 (-20)
  Re: What's Left? (Classic)
 
Personally, I don't think they'll do the TIE interceptor, but I think they should do a TIE bomber. That would be sweet. Sandcrawler? I don't think so. AT-AT...I hope so, I really hope so. And I hope they make it HUGE. Not like the wimpy AT-ST they (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What's Left? (Classic)
 
(...) <snips all along> (...) I imagine we'll at least see a play set... the Jawas are highly recognizable. (...) Actually it did appear (very briefly) in the first film. It never appeared in flight, but it was in there. (...) We can hope for (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Figs with the AT-ST
 
For those of you who have been fortunate enough to locate and purchase the new sets, which figs actually come with the AT-ST. (Please not just Chewie! Please not just Chewie! Please not just........) Thanks for the info. (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What's Left? (Classic)
 
----- Original Message ----- From: Lorbaat <eric@nospam.thirteen.net> Newsgroups: lugnet.starwars Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 1:28 PM Subject: What's Left? (Classic) (...) Forget (...) Never know, maybe an twin Imperial pack? (...) They could (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: What's Left? (Classic)
 
(...) <some snippage> (...) I think they could do it. It wouldn't be to scale, but I think it could at least have a cockpit area and a place below for some droids. They could use the tread thingys from the Arctic sets. (...) Could be. (...) Hmmm... (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A few of my SW MOCS
 
(...) Yep, it's white. Look at the official set and contrast colors in the middle wing; you'll see a 1x6x5 gray wall in it. You'll see I got rid of all that:) Personally, I'd prefer it white...it looks more like the actual ship in white than in (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A few of my SW MOCS
 
Since I haven't seen the Shuttle or AT-ST yet, other than the pics, I can't comment too much. But the AT-ST looks much better than the official one I think. Also, is the Shuttle actually white??? The Lego version, I mean, I thought it was grey? And (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  What's Left? (Classic)
 
I was just thinking about the SW sets we've seen so far from the Classic Trilogy, and I was realising that TLC is almost out of major vehicles! Forget speculation about what they *might* do next, what's left to do? *TIE Interceptor *TIE Bomber I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: A few of my SW MOCS
 
(...) <snip> (...) The AT-ST is quite swell, I'm fairly impressed. I like the Falcon and the Shuttle too, but I think the best of the bunch is the AT-ST. The Falcon retains the overall "feel" of the Lego set, but looks much better. I don't have the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  A few of my SW MOCS
 
Recently I found the AT-ST and Imperial Shuttle and had to modify right away. It also so-happens I finished my Millenium Falcon about the same time, so I felt motivated to put pics of all three models up. The AT-ST is totally different from the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 2001 search...
 
(...) I agree... it's also great because every now and then when searching for the new sets you'll come across a large older set that you put off buying until it was too late... or so you thought. I love it when the local Kaybees clean out their (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 2001 search...
 
(...) Sometimes looking is part of the fun for me. But then again when you turn up empty handed it is a bummer. oh The excitment of looking up to the top shelf and seeing 4 TIEs turned backward so all you can read is the set number and the other (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 2001 search...
 
(...) I know, it's a crying shame. I picked up one of the large UFO sets there on clearance this summer. They used to be a great source for Lego. (...) I forgot about the Target on Circle! I'm rarely in that part of town ('cept when I go to the (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Probe Droid Pics
 
(...) By any chance, were you thinking of these? "(URL) this helps, Franklin (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 2001 search...
 
(...) D'oh! ZB had a great seletection once. :( Havn't had a change to go there in a while. (...) Not suprizing, CS has to be the largest "backwater" city in the country. Oh, and there are 3 Targets! 2 on Acadamy (1 near the Citadel and one up (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 2001 search...
 
A tragedy indeed, Bryan. Even though the SW 2001s are here on the East coast, not all WMarts have them, and those that do have a meager stock (as far as quantity). For example, I discovered upon returning to the WM that I found every new SW set now (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: 2001 SW found in VA
 
(...) During Thanksgiving weekend I say the Mars base at the TRU in Wilkes-Barre, PA, which is not near VA, but also probably gets its shipments from Philadelphia. I stopped at the Target on I-81 in Hagerstown, but, not suprisingly, didn't find any (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  2001 search...
 
This is a long story about my failure in searching for the 2001 SW sets. It's fairly long, so you may want to skip it, unless you enjoy this kind of thing. Last night I went on a search to find some of the 2001 SW sets here in Colorado Springs, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: New AT-ST, using plates
 
In lugnet.starwars, Jason J. Railton writes: <snip> (...) hehehe, so now we have two ways of building an AT-ST out of a Snowspeeder... <G> I wonder if there's anything that can't be done with this set... -Bryan (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Lego AT-AT
 
(...) Interesting - the foot looks quite good, but the leg is nowhere near long enough for a foot that size. All a bit too big for mine at the moment though... Jason Railton (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR