LEGO SYSTEM Space : 8807


Space / 8807

I'm back... —Simon Bateman

(URL) he, he...back and better than ever. `, ) (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Mark Sandlin

(...) Uhhhh... I don't get it. I'm clicking, but nothing's happening. ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Matthew Gerber

(...) Oh, I got it to work. It's extremely difficult to catch the cube face you want and double click it though. Some nice LCAD models hidden in there. Ignored the rude looking inks at the bottom. Oh yeah, and the page crashed my browser. Oh, and (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Simon Bateman

(...) Try single clicking first to enlarge the cube side you want, then double click. I may try to tweak the mouse sensitivity and see if I can't make it work a bit better. Do you think it might be better if I just made it a single click instead of (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Larry Pieniazek

(...) Worked for me, I was able to navigate to various places. PC/mac thing maybe? (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Mark Sandlin

(...) Ah... seems to be an Internet Exploder thing. It works in Netscape. :^P ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Simon Bateman

(...) It should work fine with IE, I never actually tested the site with Netscape personally, glad to know it works though. Did all the spacing look alright with Netscape? (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —A. Mark Wilburn

(...) Probably doing the same thing I did: clicking on the face you want to stop the cube, then it just sits there. Single clicking does nothing; you have to double click (Did I miss somewhere were it says to double-click? Not the best UI (esp the (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Duane Hess

(...) And bashing the LUGNET community, I see. I hope that you can abide by the TOS like the rest of us this time. -Duane (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —David Simmons

Regarding the website, I see a lot of sour grapes with very little emotional maturity behind any of it. Matthew, I remember your response to Jude's post and found it to be completely without merit. If you can't say anything nice, it's better for (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)

Re: I'm back... —Thad Jantzi

Hey, Simon Bateman... I'm the last person I would normally expect to dole out a lecture, but regardless of how you think the Lugnet community should or shouldn't be remembering James Jessiman, the link on the bottom of your page is downright (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Simon Bateman

(...) What's funny, is that the particular place it's linking to is what's trivializing the tragic death, not anything I've done. (...) I have a grip, quite a firm one. The stance I took on my site is fairly non emotional. Sort of like, "I said (...) (23 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Santosh Bhat

It's the way you've linked the site that is getting on peoples noses. Not eveyrone is quite the ironic sarcastic humourist you've clearly made yourself out to be. You are not amsuing me...get over it. Santosh PS. are you one of those smart arses who (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Geordan Ballantree

What did this guy do wrong? I think i missed somthing. Can someone please enlighten me? not so I can rat on him more i just wanna know who this guy is and what he did that ticked so many of you off. Links to previous posts maybe? with so many people (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Santosh Bhat

James Jessiman was an AFOL who worked on a program for drawing lego pieces etc..and to make instructions out of them. The result of his work is found at (URL) , a commonly used program for rendering lego creations. Sadly, James died a few years ago (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Jaco van der Molen

Re: I'm back... —Santosh Bhat

(...) Like I said in my other post. Its not what you've linked to, its the way you've linked. Being cynical about a memorial that respects a member of this community who has done so much for others, indicates more about YOU than anything you have to (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Jaco van der Molen

Hey, I did not write this! I did not sent a reply to these messages! (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Matthew Gerber

(...) Jaco, See: (URL) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Jaco van der Molen

Re: I'm back... —Duane Hess

(...) Not to worry. Most LUGNETters can tell the difference. It's just unfortunate that your name was chosen. -Duane (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Andrew Tyrone

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... —Aaron West

(...) And now for something completely different, www.bardstale.com Perhaps people will take note that there are OTHER THINGS in the internet to occupy our time, rather than Matthew's flames n' stuff. I say we MOVE ON. -Aaron- (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... —Gary E. Blessing

I have a question, Who in the hell is this guy? Is this the mathew formerly known as 'mad Hatter' ?? because if he is I can understand the hatred and anger. But if its someone else thats pissed everybody off, could you point me to some posts or (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Jaco van der Molen

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... —Bryan Hodges

(...) Your site is a little too political for my tastes. The models were mostly unimpressive, though I do like the Blockade and Heavy Sky models. I'm glad that I accessed it here at work because at home my piddly little 56k connection wouldn't be (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Tobias Möller

I agree with that. Yes, it was a long time since I was here the last time, but I remember that part of what made me left was that, among many other things such as LEGO releasing crap sets, my creations weren't "good enough". I have posted a few (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Mike Petrucelli

(...) I have noticed this phenomenon and I am guilty of participating in it. Personally, I only reply to posts when I actually have the time to look at the model involved. I try to look at as many as I can but there is only so much time in the day (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Larry Pieniazek

(...) I am not sure who considers them insults. Some consider them as not adding much to the thread, though. I always like to try to ask questions or make some comment, if I can. But if "wow cool" is all you want to, or have time to, add, you should (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Eric Sophie

Good point! (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Kyle D. Jackson

(...) <faint voice> Larrr-ry..., thinnnk CAAAAD... KDJ ;] ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Larry Pieniazek

(...) I can't design virtually. I need to have the real thing in my hands because I do a lot of trial and error. But yes, when I have a design done and need to capture it I put it in a big ziplock and do the capture work on the plane. Great (...) (23 years ago, 27-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Kyle D. Jackson

(...) Hopefully not ones that start with, "Sir, we're going to have to ask you to leave now..." ;] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Re: I'm back... —Larry Pieniazek

(...) Ooh, I hate those. Especially if we're already airborne. FUT off-topic.fun (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Re: I'm back... —Damian Garcia

I agree with the comments made on this line of the thread. In my opinion it is not confined to just space though. In the groups that I (semi) actively posted in, which were .dat and .space, I noticed most of the praise/criticism went to established (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

RE: I'm back... —Bram Lambrecht

(...) I think this is primarily because for there is a lot of previous work to compare with for established members. It's easier to give criticism if you know it won't be taken the wrong way. (...) I agree. Also, if others have already said (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)

Responses to MOC posting. —Trevor Pruden

(...) I'm going to ignore all the negative posts from way back in the original thread and talk about a interesting point that has been made here on posting MOCs and the level of responses we get for it. I have to agree with Damian. I'm a very new (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space)

Re: Responses to MOC posting. —Eric Sophie

Well said , I agree %100 with what you are saying. When I posted Pix of my Praying Manits, I think only 7 people responded. That's ok, because those 7 people ment a alot to me. Your right it's the journey not the destination, Bravo.... Also, your (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space)

Re: Responses to MOC posting. —Trevor Pruden

You're right, Eric: it is nice when you connect with someone after all your hard work. And I think that's where some people are getting turned off because they don't feel like they are connecting since few people if any respond. It's amazing how (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space)

Re: Responses to MOC posting. —Andrew Todd Amacher

(...) like when I announced the 2nd anniversary of Silicon Psyche with new MOCs recently- I got 1 response. But I try not to let it bother me. Besides, I get a considerable amount of positive feedback via e-mail. Later, Todd Amacher SILICON PSYCHE (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space)

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Richard Noeckel

Man this thread is hard to follow!!! (And I tried to go through all the 76+ stuff.) With all the canceled posts and the alleged ‘double-speak.’ I believe I've got all the players involved… but could someone please summaries what’s going on. I think (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —A. Mark Wilburn

(...) ... (...) Well, to the best that I could follow, it goes roughly: Matthew Moulton made disparaging remarks about someone's teaser (URL) got offended, points were made, things were said, basically a flame war erupted. What the arguments (that (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... (Clarified! ) —Richard Noeckel

Thank you so much for providing such a thorough background. I had no idea that this thread had so much depth. Now I kinda feel sorry for this Mr. Moulton. The only reason why he insulted Judes web-page was because he was harboring feelings of (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... (Clarified! ) —A. Mark Wilburn

(...) It does go rather far back, doesn't it??? That's before I ever even heard of Lugnet! (...) Yeah, that's exactly why I can't figure out what to make of all this, and why I generally don't directly participate in debates. Not because I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Mike Petrucelli

(...) You don't get it do you. You have not only violated Lugnet's TOS but also US Fedral law. (regardless of the fact it is not enforceable.) But first and for most you have violated the basic decency and trust of the comunity. You can never join (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Mike Petrucelli

(...) Desperation?! Ok for the English impaired: Even if your account is reinsated no one will forgive your transgressions. Bottom line is children are a large portion of Lugnet participants and common social decency is expected here. This is NOT a (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

(canceled) —Scott Chambers

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Paul Easter

Ok, it's time for me to step in... who am I? just a father who has heard a few to many unnecessary words. It takes at least two people to argue. If no one else will reply to this type of postings, they will quit. If someone wants to flame someone, (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Allen Romberg

(...) Finally! The voice of reason! Thank you, Paul, for saying what many of us are thinking! Some additional comments, though: If someone gets their feelings hurt on lugnet, why must they subject ALL of us to their anger? I know when <I> read (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Jon Palmer

Guys is it possible we could keep this discussion in off-topic.debate? -Jon "soc" <reallysick_of_crap@...tmail.com> wrote in message news:GDx9Jo.IDB@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) posts, (...) each (...) clarify? (...) about (...) proxy (...) I'll (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Scott Chambers

(...) <this is the REAL SOC speaking> YES!! By all means yes!! But one question - and this goes out to everybody that has asked this question... If you want it out of a group, FIX THE FOLLOW UP!!! You failed to do this, as well has most of the (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)

Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Travis Dickinson

I agree with Jon Palmer. Since he failed to put the desired newsgroup in FUT section, I've taken the liberty of doing it for him. This should apply to all discussions caused by soc's original post that obviously have gone off-topic. Travis Dickinson (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)